» Articles » PMID: 16812429

Handling Time and Choice in Pigeons

Overview
Date 1985 Sep 1
PMID 16812429
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

According to optimal foraging theory, animals should prefer food items with the highest ratios of energy intake to handling time. When single items have negligible handling times, one large item should be preferred to a collection of small ones of equivalent total weight. However, when pigeons were offered such a choice on equal concurrent variable-interval schedules in a shuttlebox, they preferred the side offering many small items per reinforcement to that offering one or a few relatively large items. This preference was still evident on concurrent fixed-cumulative-duration schedules in which choosing the alternative with longer handling time substantially lowered the rate of food intake.

Citing Articles

The rewarding effects of number and surface area of food in rats.

Wadhera D, Wilkie L, Capaldi-Phillips E Learn Behav. 2017; 46(3):242-255.

PMID: 29270881 DOI: 10.3758/s13420-017-0305-y.


Memory and foraging theory: Chimpanzee utilization of optimality heuristics in the rank-order recovery of hidden foods.

Sayers K, Menzel C Anim Behav. 2012; 84(4):795-803.

PMID: 23226837 PMC: 3513928. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.06.034.


Self-control in male and female rats.

Van Haaren F, van Hest A, Van de Poll N J Exp Anal Behav. 1988; 49(2):201-11.

PMID: 16812536 PMC: 1338807. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-201.


Scaling pigeons' choice of feeds: bigger is better.

Killeen P, Cate H, Tran T J Exp Anal Behav. 1993; 60(1):203-17.

PMID: 8354967 PMC: 1322155. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-203.

References
1.
Schneider J . Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973; 20(3):461-71. PMC: 1334171. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-461. View

2.
Hinson J, Staddon J . Hill-climbing by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983; 39(1):25-47. PMC: 1347881. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-25. View

3.
Moon R, Zeigler H . Food preferences in the pigeon (Columba livia). Physiol Behav. 1979; 22(6):1171-82. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(79)90273-7. View

4.
Chung S . Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965; 8(6):439-44. PMC: 1338130. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-439. View

5.
Chung S, Herrnstein R . Choice and delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967; 10(1):67-74. PMC: 1338319. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67. View