Preference for Signaled Versus Unsignaled Reinforcement Delay in Concurrent-chain Schedules
Overview
Social Sciences
Authors
Affiliations
A concurrent-chain schedule was employed to examine pigeons' preferences for signaled versus unsignaled delay of reinforcement in which the delay durations ranged from zero to ten seconds. In general, pigeons preferred signaled delay over unsignaled delay especially when a variable-interval 30-second schedule operated in each initial link; when a variable-interval 90-second schedule operated in each initial link, these preferences tended toward indifference or were attenuated. In addition, prior training seemed to exert partial control over behavior. Responding in the terminal link was higher under signaled delay than unsignaled delay in a majority of the cases. Moreover, response rates under signaled delay remained fairly constant whereas responding under unsignaled delay was initially high, but decreased systematically with delay durations as short as 2.5 seconds. These results are consistent with a number of other studies demonstrating the significant role of a signal for impending positive stimuli.
Preference for less segmented fixed-time components in concurrent-chain schedules of reinforcement.
Leung J, Winton A J Exp Anal Behav. 1986; 46(2):175-83.
PMID: 16812458 PMC: 1348284. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-175.
Handling time and choice in pigeons.
Shettleworth S J Exp Anal Behav. 1985; 44(2):139-55.
PMID: 16812429 PMC: 1348173. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-139.
Preference for unsegmented interreinforcement intervals in concurrent chains.
Leung J, Winton A J Exp Anal Behav. 1985; 44(1):89-101.
PMID: 16812428 PMC: 1348163. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-89.
Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.
Killeen P J Exp Anal Behav. 1982; 38(2):217-32.
PMID: 16812299 PMC: 1347819. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.38-217.