» Articles » PMID: 16811716

Effects of Stimulus Duration on Observing Behavior Maintained by Differential Reinforcement Magnitude

Overview
Date 1973 Nov 1
PMID 16811716
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pigeons made observing responses for stimuli signalling the availability of either 10-sec or 2-sec access to grain on fixed-interval 1-min schedules. If observing responses did not occur, food-producing responses occurred to a stimulus common to both reinforcement magnitudes. When the stimuli remained on for the duration of the components and signalled differential reinforcement magnitudes, observing responses were maintained; however, when the stimuli remained on for 10 sec, observing responses decreased markedly. In addition, it was shown that the occasional presentation of the stimulus signalling 10-sec access to grain was necessary for the maintenance of observing behavior. A control condition demonstrated that when all the available stimuli signalled 6-sec access to grain, observing responses declined. Taken together, the results demonstrated that the occasional presentation of the stimulus that remained on for the duration of the component and signalled the larger reinforcement magnitude was necessary for the maintenance of observing behavior.

Citing Articles

The effect of negative stimulus presentations on observing-response rates.

Mueller K, Dinsmoor J J Exp Anal Behav. 1986; 46(3):281-91.

PMID: 16812463 PMC: 1348267. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-281.


Choice and multiple reinforcers.

Moore J J Exp Anal Behav. 1982; 37(1):115-22.

PMID: 16812258 PMC: 1333122. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-115.


Conditioned reinforcement as a function of duration of stimulus.

Dinsmoor J, Mulvaney D, Jwaideh A J Exp Anal Behav. 1981; 36(1):41-9.

PMID: 16812230 PMC: 1333051. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.36-41.


The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior.

Case D, Fantino E J Exp Anal Behav. 1981; 35(1):93-108.

PMID: 16812203 PMC: 1333025. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-93.


Uncertainty reduction, conditioned reinforcement, and observing.

Fantino E, Moore J J Exp Anal Behav. 1980; 33(1):3-13.

PMID: 16812160 PMC: 1332908. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-3.


References
1.
Neuringer A . Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967; 10(5):417-24. PMC: 1338405. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-417. View

2.
Dinsmoor J, Browne M, Lawrence C . A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972; 18(1):79-85. PMC: 1333986. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-79. View

3.
KEESEY R, Kling J . Amount of reinforcement and free-operant responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961; 4:125-32. PMC: 1404051. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-125. View

4.
Catania A . Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:299-300. PMC: 1404290. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-299. View

5.
Catania A . Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963; 6:253-63. PMC: 1404302. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-253. View