» Articles » PMID: 16812043

Behavioral Contrast As Differential Time Allocation

Overview
Date 1978 Mar 1
PMID 16812043
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In Experiment I, hooded rats were exposed to multiple variable-interval schedules of reinforcement in which manipulanda and reinforcement magazines at opposite ends of the experimental chamber were associated with the different components. Time allocated to each component was measured by recording the time spent by the subject in the appropriate half of the chamber. Positive behavioral contrast was observed for the comparison between multiple variable-interval 30-second variable-interval 30-second and multiple variable-interval 30-second variable-interval 90-second conditions for both response frequency and time allocation measures, but not for mean local response rate (response frequency per time allocated to a component). In Experiment II, rats were exposed to multiple variable-time schedules in which reinforcement was response independent. Time allocated to each component was measured for two conditions, multiple variable-time 30-second variable-time 30-second and multiple variable-time 30-second variable-time 90-second. Positive behavioral contrast of time allocation was exhibited. The results indicated that time allocation was differentially sensitive to changes in reinforcement probability, and that behavioral contrast may result from the differential allocation of time to the different components of the multiple schedule.

Citing Articles

Momentary maximizing in concurrent schedules with a minimum interchangeover interval.

Todorov J, Souza D, Bori C J Exp Anal Behav. 1993; 60(2):415-35.

PMID: 16812704 PMC: 1322184. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-415.


Delayed and current stimulus control in successive discriminations.

White K J Exp Anal Behav. 1990; 54(1):31-43.

PMID: 16812614 PMC: 1322944. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1990.54-31.


Effects of response-allocation constraints on multiple-schedule performance.

Davison M, Charman L J Exp Anal Behav. 1987; 47(1):29-39.

PMID: 16812469 PMC: 1348295. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-29.


On the measurement of time allocation on multiple variable-interval schedules.

Davison M, Charman L J Exp Anal Behav. 1986; 46(3):353-62.

PMID: 16812466 PMC: 1348272. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-353.


Temporal constraint on choice: Sensitivity and bias in multiple schedules.

McLean A, White K J Exp Anal Behav. 1983; 39(3):405-26.

PMID: 16812327 PMC: 1347852. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-405.


References
1.
Pear J, Wilkie D . Contrast and induction in rats on multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971; 15(3):289-96. PMC: 1333839. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-289. View

2.
Herrnstein R . On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 13(2):243-66. PMC: 1333768. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. View

3.
Arnett F . A local-rate-of-response and interresponse-time analysis of behavioral contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973; 20(3):489-98. PMC: 1334174. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-489. View

4.
Stiers M, Silberberg A . Lever-contact responses in rats: automaintenance with and without a negative response-reinforcer dependency. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974; 22(3):497-506. PMC: 1333298. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-497. View

5.
Menlove R . Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975; 23(3):309-37. PMC: 1333358. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-309. View