» Articles » PMID: 16812614

Delayed and Current Stimulus Control in Successive Discriminations

Overview
Date 1990 Jul 1
PMID 16812614
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In a successive discrimination in which successively alternating red and green hues signaled component variable-interval schedules, sensitivity of the ratio of responses in the two components to variation in the component reinforcer ratio decreased systematically during the course of the component. This decrease in stimulus control or discrimination over the course of the component was shown to be the result of delayed control of responding during the component by the stimulus transition between components. When the red-green stimulus transition was altered by interpolating a white stimulus at the end of each 60-s component, discrimination at the beginning of the component (measured by the power-function exponent for sensitivity to reinforcement) was reduced. Conditions with the white stimulus inserted in other quarters of the component indicated that the current discriminative stimulus exerts control over responding throughout the component, whereas during about the first half of the component, response differentials are influenced by the transition between discriminative stimuli.

Citing Articles

Action at a temporal distance: Component transition as the relational basis for successive discrimination.

White K J Exp Anal Behav. 1995; 64(2):185-213.

PMID: 16812767 PMC: 1350109. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-185.


Momentary maximizing in concurrent schedules with a minimum interchangeover interval.

Todorov J, Souza D, Bori C J Exp Anal Behav. 1993; 60(2):415-35.

PMID: 16812704 PMC: 1322184. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-415.

References
1.
Herrnstein R . On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970; 13(2):243-66. PMC: 1333768. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. View

2.
White K . Behavioral contrast as differential time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 29(2):151-60. PMC: 1332743. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-151. View

3.
McSweeney F, Farmer V, Dougan J, Whipple J . The generalized matching law as a description of multiple-schedule responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986; 45(1):83-101. PMC: 1348213. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-83. View

4.
White K, Pipe M, McLean A, Redman S . Temporal proximity and reinforcement sensitivity in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985; 44(2):207-15. PMC: 1348178. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.44-207. View

5.
White K . Interresponse-time analysis of stimulus control in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1985; 43(3):331-9. PMC: 1348146. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1985.43-331. View