Three Versions of the Additive Theories of Behavioral Contrast

Overview

Journal J Exp Anal Behav

Specialties Psychology
Social Sciences

Date 1981 Sep 1

PMID 16812247

Citations 4

Authors

F K McSweeney

R H Ettinger

W D Norman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The additive theories of behavioral contrast state that contrast will occur only when two types of responses interact during multiple schedules. Three more specific versions of the theories may be defined according to how they distinguish these two types of responses. A strong version physically distinguishes them. A second version distinguishes them according to the theoretical processes which control them. A weak version distinguishes them on the basis of the environmental relations which control them. Only the weak version of the theories is currently testable. The weak theory should be tested by establishing each of the two environmental relations independently and then combining them to assess their effect on behavior. Because this test is not usually performed, many of the results which have been taken to support or contradict the additive theories are actually ambiguous.

Citing Articles

Facets of Pavlovian and operant extinction.

Lattal K, Lattal K Behav Processes. 2012; 90(1):1-8.

PMID: 22465468 PMC: 3337697. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.03.009.

Jeab at 50: coevolution of research and technology.

Lattal K J Exp Anal Behav. 2008; 89(1):129-35.

PMID: 18338681 PMC: 2211435. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-129.

Another look at contrast in multiple schedules.

Williams B J Exp Anal Behav. 1983; 39(2):345-84.

PMID: 16812325 PMC: 1347926. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-345.

Positive behavioral contrast when pigeons press treadles during multiple schedules.

McSweeney F J Exp Anal Behav. 1983; 39(1):149-56.

PMID: 16812307 PMC: 1347890. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-149.

References

Hamilton B, Silberberg A . Contrast and autoshaping in multiple schedules varying reinforcer rate and duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 30(1):107-22. PMC: 1332737. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-107. View

Jensen C, Fallon D . Behavioral aftereffects of reinforcement and its omission as a function of reinforcement magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973; 19(3):459-68. PMC: 1334141. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-459. View

McSweeney F . Negative behavioral contrast on multiple treadle-press schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 29(3):463-73. PMC: 1332844. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-463. View

Schwartz B . Stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and local behavioral contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 29(2):297-308. PMC: 1332758. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-297. View

Davison M, Ferguson A . The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 29(2):283-95. PMC: 1332757. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-283. View

Innis N . Contrast effects in multiple fixed-interval reinforcement schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 29(2):233-42. PMC: 1332751. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-233. View

White K . Behavioral contrast as differential time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978; 29(2):151-60. PMC: 1332743. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-151. View

Woodruff G, Conner N, Gamzu E, Williams D . Associative interaction: joint control of key pecking by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer relationships. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977; 28(2):133-44. PMC: 1333625. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-133. View

Atnip G . Stimulus- and response-reinforcer contingencies in autoshaping, operant, classical, and omission training procedures in rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977; 28(1):59-69. PMC: 1333614. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.28-59. View

10.

Schwartz B . Two types of pigeon key pecking: suppression of long- but not short-duration key pecks by duration-dependent shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977; 27(2):393-8. PMC: 1333603. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-393. View

11.

Williams D, Williams H . Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969; 12(4):511-20. PMC: 1338642. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-511. View

12.

Schwartz B . Studies of operant and reflexive key pecks in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977; 27(2):301-13. PMC: 1333594. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-301. View

13.

Gamzu E, Schwartz B . The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973; 19(1):65-72. PMC: 1334052. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-65. View

14.

de Villiers P . Reinforcement and response rate interaction in multiple random-interval avoidance schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972; 18(3):499-507. PMC: 1334036. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-499. View

15.

Schwartz B, Williams D . Two different kinds of key peck in the pigeon: some properties of responses maintained by negative and positive response-reinforcer contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972; 18(2):201-16. PMC: 1334004. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-201. View

16.

Williams B, Heyneman N . Determinants of contrast in the signal-key procedure: Evidence against additivity theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981; 35(2):161-73. PMC: 1333035. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-161. View

17.

Wilkie D . Variable-time reinforcement in multiple and concurrent schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972; 17(1):59-66. PMC: 1333892. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-59. View

18.

McDowell J . An analytic comparison of Herrnstein's equations and a multivariate rate equation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980; 33(3):397-408. PMC: 1332965. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.33-397. View

19.

McSweeney F, Norman W . Defining behavioral contrast for multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979; 32(3):457-61. PMC: 1332985. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-457. View

20.

Pear J, Wilkie D . Contrast and induction in rats on multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971; 15(3):289-96. PMC: 1333839. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-289. View