Correspondence Between Saying and Doing: Some Thoughts on Defining Correspondence and Future Directions for Application
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Israel (1978) evaluated and discussed research on positive and negative verbal-nonverbal correspondence. In the present report we attempt to delineate the relationship of correspondence training to two major intervention goals-producing (increasing) behavior and inhibiting (decreasing) behavior. The concepts of noncorrespondence and generalized positive correspondence are introduced. Past research relating to the correspondence analyses offered for the two intervention outcomes and possibilities for future research are discussed. The relationship of verbal correspondence training to the issues of response maintenance and response generalization is also examined.
An Extension of the Effects of Praising Positive Qualifying Autoclitics on the Frequency of Reading.
Sheyab M, Pritchard J, Malady M Anal Verbal Behav. 2016; 30(2):141-7.
PMID: 27429895 PMC: 4883526. DOI: 10.1007/s40616-014-0017-8.
A review of correspondence training: Suggestions for a revival.
Lloyd K Behav Anal. 2012; 25(1):57-73.
PMID: 22478378 PMC: 2731594. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392045.
Behav Anal. 2012; 17(1):141-4.
PMID: 22478179 PMC: 2733685. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392659.
A procedural analysis of correspondence training techniques.
Paniagua F Behav Anal. 2012; 13(2):107-19.
PMID: 22478059 PMC: 2733417. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392528.
The buckle-up promise card: A versatile intervention for large-scale behavior change.
Geller E J Appl Behav Anal. 1991; 24(1):91-4.
PMID: 16795747 PMC: 1279550. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1991.24-91.