St Peter C
Behav Anal. 2015; 36(1):155-60.
PMID: 25729139
PMC: 3640881.
DOI: 10.1007/BF03392299.
Pierce W, Epling W
Behav Anal. 2012; 3(1):1-9.
PMID: 22478471
PMC: 2741804.
DOI: 10.1007/BF03392373.
Lloyd K
Behav Anal. 2012; 25(1):57-73.
PMID: 22478378
PMC: 2731594.
DOI: 10.1007/BF03392045.
Street W
Behav Anal. 2012; 17(1):145-53.
PMID: 22478180
PMC: 2733694.
DOI: 10.1007/BF03392660.
Lloyd K
Behav Anal. 2012; 17(1):131-9.
PMID: 22478178
PMC: 2733705.
DOI: 10.1007/BF03392658.
A procedural analysis of correspondence training techniques.
Paniagua F
Behav Anal. 2012; 13(2):107-19.
PMID: 22478059
PMC: 2733417.
DOI: 10.1007/BF03392528.
Verbal behavior.
Michael J
J Exp Anal Behav. 1984; 42(3):363-76.
PMID: 16812395
PMC: 1348108.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-363.
Recent reinforcement-schedule research and applied behavior analysis.
Lattal K, Neef N
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996; 29(2):213-30.
PMID: 16795888
PMC: 1279895.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-213.
On the functional role of the verbalization in correspondence training procedures.
Baer R
J Appl Behav Anal. 1988; 21(4):345-56.
PMID: 16795717
PMC: 1286134.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-345.
Correspondence between definitions and procedures: A reply to Stokes, Osnes, and Guevremont.
Catania A, Shimoff E, Matthews B
J Appl Behav Anal. 1987; 20(4):401-4.
PMID: 16795708
PMC: 1286080.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-401.
Saying and doing: A contingency-space analysis.
Matthews B, Shimoff E, Catania A
J Appl Behav Anal. 1987; 20(1):69-74.
PMID: 16795696
PMC: 1285952.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-69.
Delayed reinforcement as an indiscriminable contingency in verbal/nonverbal correspondence training.
Baer R, Williams J, Osnes P, Stokes T
J Appl Behav Anal. 1984; 17(4):429-40.
PMID: 16795679
PMC: 1307965.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-429.
Correspondence between saying and doing: Some thoughts on defining correspondence and future directions for application.
Karlan G, Rusch F
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982; 15(1):151-62.
PMID: 16795654
PMC: 1308254.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-151.
Selection by consequences: one unifying principle for a transdisciplinary science of prevention.
Biglan A
Prev Sci. 2003; 4(4):213-32.
PMID: 14598995
DOI: 10.1023/a:1026064014562.
Correspondence as conditional stimulus control: insights from experiments with pigeons.
Lattal K, Doepke K
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001; 34(2):127-44.
PMID: 11421307
PMC: 1284307.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-127.
Toward a methodology of withdrawal designs for the assessment of response maintenance.
Rusch F, Kazdin A
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981; 14(2):131-40.
PMID: 7287597
PMC: 1308197.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-131.
Improving classroom behavior in mentally retarded children through correspondence training.
Whitman T, Scibak J, Butler K, Richter R, Johnson M
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982; 15(4):545-64.
PMID: 7153191
PMC: 1308301.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-545.
The local organization of behavior: dissociations between a pigeon's behavior and self-reports of that behavior.
Shimp C
J Exp Anal Behav. 1983; 39(1):61-8.
PMID: 6833940
PMC: 1347883.
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-61.
Using intermittent reinforcement to program maintenance of verbal/nonverbal correspondence.
Baer R, Blount R, Detrich R, Stokes T
J Appl Behav Anal. 1987; 20(2):179-84.
PMID: 3610897
PMC: 1285969.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-179.
Correspondence training: an example of rule-governed behavior?.
Deacon J, Konarski Jr E
J Appl Behav Anal. 1987; 20(4):391-400.
PMID: 3429361
PMC: 1286079.
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-391.