Programming Maintenance After Correspondence Training Interventions with Children
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Interventions were employed to program maintenance following correspondence training. The use of reinforcement of verbalization and a mixed sequence of procedures designed to establish indiscriminable contingencies was evaluated in multiple-baseline designs across subjects and behaviors. The results indicated that target behaviors were maintained under less intrusive interventions and in the absence of programmed contingencies during extended follow-up conditions. The results are discussed in terms of changes in reinforcement schedules established in maintenance interventions.
A review of correspondence training: Suggestions for a revival.
Lloyd K Behav Anal. 2012; 25(1):57-73.
PMID: 22478378 PMC: 2731594. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392045.
A procedural analysis of correspondence training techniques.
Paniagua F Behav Anal. 2012; 13(2):107-19.
PMID: 22478059 PMC: 2733417. DOI: 10.1007/BF03392528.
On the functional role of the verbalization in correspondence training procedures.
Baer R J Appl Behav Anal. 1988; 21(4):345-56.
PMID: 16795717 PMC: 1286134. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1988.21-345.
Correspondence between definitions and procedures: A reply to Stokes, Osnes, and Guevremont.
Catania A, Shimoff E, Matthews B J Appl Behav Anal. 1987; 20(4):401-4.
PMID: 16795708 PMC: 1286080. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-401.
Saying and doing: A commentary on a contingency-space analysis.
Stokes T, Osnes P J Appl Behav Anal. 1987; 20(2):161-4.
PMID: 16795698 PMC: 1285966. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1987.20-161.