Monte Carlo Calculations for Absolute Dosimetry to Determine Machine Outputs for Proton Therapy Fields

Overview

Journal Phys Med Biol

Publisher IOP Publishing

Specialties Biophysics
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology

Date 2006 May 26

PMID 16723767

Citations 13

Authors

Harald Paganetti

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The prescribed dose in radiation therapy has to be converted into machine monitor units for patient treatment. This is done routinely for each spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) field either by calibration measurements, by using analytical algorithms or by relying on empirical data. At the Northeast Proton Therapy Center, a monitor unit corresponds to a fixed amount of charge collected in a segmented transmission ionization chamber inside the treatment head. The goal of this work was to use a detailed Monte Carlo model of the treatment head to calculate the dose delivered to the patient as a function of ionization chamber reading, i.e. to yield absolute dose in patients in terms of machine monitor units. The results show excellent agreement with measurements. For 50 SOBP fields considered in this study, the mean absolute difference between the experimental and the calculated value is 1.5%, where approximately 50% of the fields agree within 1%. This is within the uncertainties of the data. The Monte Carlo method has advantages over analytical algorithms because it takes into account scattered and secondary radiation, does not rely on empirical parameters, and provides a tool to study the influence of parts of the treatment head on the ionization chamber reading. Compared to experimental methods the Monte Carlo method has the advantage of being able to verify the dose in the patient geometry.

Citing Articles

Estimation of relative biological effectiveness of Ac compared to Lu during [Ac]Ac-PSMA and [Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy using TOPAS/TOPAS-nBio/MEDRAS.

Rumiantcev M, Li W, Lindner S, Liubchenko G, Resch S, Bartenstein P EJNMMI Phys. 2023; 10(1):53.

PMID: 37695374 PMC: 10495309. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-023-00567-2.

Development and validation of an optimal GATE model for proton pencil-beam scanning delivery.

Asadi A, Akhavanallaf A, Hosseini S, Vosoughi N, Zaidi H Z Med Phys. 2022; 33(4):591-600.

PMID: 36424313 PMC: 10751712. DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.008.

Evaluation of monitor unit calculation based on measurement and calculation with a simplified Monte Carlo method for passive beam delivery system in proton beam therapy.

Hotta K, Kohno R, Nagafuchi K, Yamaguchi H, Tansho R, Takada Y J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015; 16(5):228–238.

PMID: 26699303 PMC: 5690152. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5419.

Implementation of an improved dose-per-MU model for double-scattered proton beams to address interbeamline modulation width variability.

Lin L, Shen J, Ainsley C, Solberg T, McDonough J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014; 15(3):4748.

PMID: 24892352 PMC: 5711055. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i3.4748.

Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.

Testa M, Schumann J, Lu H, Shin J, Faddegon B, Perl J Med Phys. 2013; 40(12):121719.

PMID: 24320505 PMC: 4109425. DOI: 10.1118/1.4828781.

References

Haryanto F, Fippel M, Laub W, Dohm O, Nusslin F . Investigation of photon beam output factors for conformal radiation therapy--Monte Carlo simulations and measurements. Phys Med Biol. 2002; 47(11):N133-43. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/11/401. View

Kooy H, Schaefer M, Rosenthal S, Bortfeld T . Monitor unit calculations for range-modulated spread-out Bragg peak fields. Phys Med Biol. 2003; 48(17):2797-808. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/17/305. View

Ding G . Using Monte Carlo simulations to commission photon beam output factors--a feasibility study. Phys Med Biol. 2004; 48(23):3865-74. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/23/005. View

Paganetti H . Four-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation of time-dependent geometries. Phys Med Biol. 2004; 49(6):N75-81. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/6/n03. View

Ma C, Price Jr R, Li J, Chen L, Wang L, Fourkal E . Monitor unit calculation for Monte Carlo treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2004; 49(9):1671-87. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/9/006. View

Paganetti H, Jiang H, Lee S, Kooy H . Accurate Monte Carlo simulations for nozzle design, commissioning and quality assurance for a proton radiation therapy facility. Med Phys. 2004; 31(7):2107-18. DOI: 10.1118/1.1762792. View

Ding G . An investigation of accelerator head scatter and output factor in air. Med Phys. 2004; 31(9):2527-33. DOI: 10.1118/1.1784131. View

Kanai T, Kohno T, Minohara S, Sudou M, Takada E, Soga F . Dosimetry and measured differential W values of air for heavy ions. Radiat Res. 1993; 135(3):293-301. View

Siebers J, Vatnitsky S, Miller D, Moyers M . Deduction of the air w value in a therapeutic proton beam. Phys Med Biol. 1995; 40(8):1339-56. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/40/8/004. View

10.

Hong L, Goitein M, Bucciolini M, Comiskey R, Gottschalk B, Rosenthal S . A pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations. Phys Med Biol. 1996; 41(8):1305-30. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/8/005. View

11.

Jongen Y, Beeckman W, Cohilis P . The proton therapy system for MGH's NPTC: equipment description and progress report. Bull Cancer Radiother. 1996; 83 Suppl:219s-22s. DOI: 10.1016/0924-4212(96)84917-6. View

12.

Palmans H, Verhaegen F . Monte Carlo study of fluence perturbation effects on cavity dose response in clinical proton beams. Phys Med Biol. 1998; 43(1):65-89. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/1/005. View

13.

Kapur A, Ma C, Mok E, Findley D, Boyer A . Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam output factors for a medical linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 1998; 43(12):3479-94. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/12/007. View

14.

Jiang H, Paganetti H . Adaptation of GEANT4 to Monte Carlo dose calculations based on CT data. Med Phys. 2004; 31(10):2811-8. DOI: 10.1118/1.1796952. View

15.

Turian J, Smith B, Bernard D, Griem K, Chu J . Monte Carlo calculations of output factors for clinically shaped electron fields. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2005; 5(2):42-63. PMC: 5723462. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v5i2.1976. View

16.

Poon E, Seuntjens J, Verhaegen F . Consistency test of the electron transport algorithm in the GEANT4 Monte Carlo code. Phys Med Biol. 2005; 50(4):681-94. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/4/008. View

17.

Popescu I, Shaw C, Zavgorodni S, Beckham W . Absolute dose calculations for Monte Carlo simulations of radiotherapy beams. Phys Med Biol. 2005; 50(14):3375-92. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/14/013. View

18.

Kooy H, Rosenthal S, Engelsman M, Mazal A, Slopsema R, Paganetti H . The prediction of output factors for spread-out proton Bragg peak fields in clinical practice. Phys Med Biol. 2005; 50(24):5847-56. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/24/006. View

19.

Liu H, Mackie T, McCullough E . Modeling photon output caused by backscattered radiation into the monitor chamber from collimator jaws using a Monte Carlo technique. Med Phys. 2000; 27(4):737-44. DOI: 10.1118/1.598936. View

20.

Paganetti H . Nuclear interactions in proton therapy: dose and relative biological effect distributions originating from primary and secondary particles. Phys Med Biol. 2002; 47(5):747-64. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/5/305. View