Biological Skin Substitutes for Wound Cover and Closure
Overview
Radiology
Affiliations
In the past 30 years, the development and use of artificial skin in the treatment of acute and chronic wounds has advanced from an experimental concept to a working reality. However, while there have been an increasing number of artificial skin substitutes licensed for clinical use, they have yet to supplant the current gold standard of an autologous tissue graft for most applications. This article reviews the advantages and disadvantages of the currently available, biologically based substitutes, with special emphasis on their relative efficacy and suitability for treatment of particular wound types. Economic considerations, desirable improvements of currently available materials and the potential impact of future advances in the field will also be discussed.
Multi-functional dressings for recovery and screenable treatment of wounds: A review.
Moradifar F, Sepahdoost N, Tavakoli P, Mirzapoor A Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41465.
PMID: 39831167 PMC: 11742314. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41465.
Recent advances in decellularized biomaterials for wound healing.
Xiao H, Chen X, Liu X, Wen G, Yu Y Mater Today Bio. 2023; 19:100589.
PMID: 36880081 PMC: 9984902. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100589.
Therapeutic Efficacy of Artificial Skin Produced by 3D Bioprinting.
Jang K, Park S, Choi J, Kim H, Shim K, Kim M Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(18).
PMID: 34576409 PMC: 8467964. DOI: 10.3390/ma14185177.
Ahn G, Eo H, Kim D, Choi S Biomater Res. 2020; 24(1):22.
PMID: 33298195 PMC: 7724873. DOI: 10.1186/s40824-020-00201-7.
Xu F, Zou D, Dai T, Xu H, An R, Liu Y Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):14042.
PMID: 30232343 PMC: 6145885. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-32208-5.