» Articles » PMID: 24527287

Clinical Evaluation of NIKS-Based Bioengineered Skin Substitute Tissue in Complex Skin Defects: Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial Results

Overview
Date 2014 Feb 15
PMID 24527287
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Complex skin defects, such as burns and acute cutaneous trauma, are life-threatening injuries, often requiring temporary allograft placement to maintain fluid homeostasis and prevent infection until permanent wound closure is possible.

The Problem: The current standard of care for the management of full-thickness wounds that are unable to be closed in a single surgical stage is temporary coverage with cadaver allograft until an acceptable wound bed has been established. This approach has limitations including limited availability of human cadaver skin, the risk of disease transmission from cadaveric grafts, and inconsistent cadaver allograft quality.

Basic/clinical Science: Near-diploid neonatal human keratinocyte cell line (NIKS)-based human skin tissue is a full-thickness, living human skin substitute composed of a dermal analog containing normal human dermal fibroblasts and a fully-stratified, biologically and metabolically active epidermis generated from NIKS keratinocytes, a consistent and unlimited source of pathogen-free human epidermal progenitor cells.

Clinical Care Relevance: NIKS-based human skin tissue is a living bioengineered skin substitute (BSS) intended to provide immediate wound coverage and promote wound healing through sustained expression by living cells of wound healing factors.

Conclusion: A phase I/IIa clinical trial found that NIKS-based BSS was well tolerated and comparable to cadaver allograft in the ability to prepare full-thickness complex skin defects prior to autografting. There were no deaths and no adverse events (AE) associated with this BSS. Exposure of the study subjects to the skin substitute tissue did not elicit detectable immune responses. Notably, this tissue remained viable and adherent in the wound bed for at least 7 days.

Citing Articles

Advancements in cell-based therapies for thermal burn wounds: a comprehensive systematic review of clinical trials outcomes.

Yassaghi Y, Nazerian Y, Niazi F, Niknejad H Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024; 15(1):277.

PMID: 39227861 PMC: 11373270. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-024-03901-2.


Plasticity of bone marrow-derived cell differentiation depending on microenvironments in the skin.

Okano J, Nakagawa T, Kojima H Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1391640.

PMID: 38699142 PMC: 11063383. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1391640.


Inherited DNA Repair Defects Disrupt the Structure and Function of Human Skin.

Ruiz-Torres S, Brusadelli M, Witte D, Wikenheiser-Brokamp K, Sauter S, Nelson A Cell Stem Cell. 2020; 28(3):424-435.e6.

PMID: 33232662 PMC: 7935766. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.10.012.


Skin Tissue Substitutes and Biomaterial Risk Assessment and Testing.

Savoji H, Godau B, Sheikh Hassani M, Akbari M Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018; 6:86.

PMID: 30094235 PMC: 6070628. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00086.


Tissue engineering of skin and regenerative medicine for wound care.

Boyce S, Lalley A Burns Trauma. 2018; 6:4.

PMID: 30009192 PMC: 6040609. DOI: 10.1186/s41038-017-0103-y.


References
1.
MacNeil S . Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin. Nature. 2007; 445(7130):874-80. DOI: 10.1038/nature05664. View

2.
Thomas-Virnig C, Centanni J, Johnston C, He L, Schlosser S, Van Winkle K . Inhibition of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by nonviral expression of hCAP-18 in a bioengineered human skin tissue. Mol Ther. 2009; 17(3):562-9. PMC: 2736055. DOI: 10.1038/mt.2008.289. View

3.
Phillips T, Provan A, Colbert D, Easley K . A randomized single-blind controlled study of cultured epidermal allografts in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Arch Dermatol. 1993; 129(7):879-82. View

4.
Hrabchak C, Flynn L, Woodhouse K . Biological skin substitutes for wound cover and closure. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006; 3(3):373-85. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.3.3.373. View

5.
Han A, Zenilman J, Melendez J, Shirtliff M, Agostinho A, James G . The importance of a multifaceted approach to characterizing the microbial flora of chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2011; 19(5):532-41. PMC: 3227014. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00720.x. View