» Articles » PMID: 16614446

Comparison of Characteristics and Function of Translation Termination Signals Between and Within Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Organisms

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2006 Apr 15
PMID 16614446
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Six diverse prokaryotic and five eukaryotic genomes were compared to deduce whether the protein synthesis termination signal has common determinants within and across both kingdoms. Four of the six prokaryotic and all of the eukaryotic genomes investigated demonstrated a similar pattern of nucleotide bias both 5' and 3' of the stop codon. A preferred core signal of 4 nt was evident, encompassing the stop codon and the following nucleotide. Codons decoded by hyper-modified tRNAs were over-represented in the region 5' to the stop codon in genes from both kingdoms. The origin of the 3' bias was more variable particularly among the prokaryotic organisms. In both kingdoms, genes with the highest expression index exhibited a strong bias but genes with the lowest expression showed none. Absence of bias in parasitic prokaryotes may reflect an absence of pressure to evolve more efficient translation. Experiments were undertaken to determine if a correlation existed between bias in signal abundance and termination efficiency. In Escherichia coli signal abundance correlated with termination efficiency for UAA and UGA stop codons, but not in mammalian cells. Termination signals that were highly inefficient could be made more efficient by increasing the concentration of the cognate decoding release factor.

Citing Articles

Differential Selection for Translation Efficiency Shapes Translation Machineries in Bacterial Species.

Farookhi H, Xia X Microorganisms. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38674712 PMC: 11052298. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12040768.


High-Resolution Ribosome Profiling Reveals Gene-Specific Details of UGA Re-Coding in Selenoprotein Biosynthesis.

Bohleber S, Fradejas-Villar N, Zhao W, Reuter U, Schweizer U Biomolecules. 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36291713 PMC: 9599142. DOI: 10.3390/biom12101504.


Variance in translational fidelity of different bacterial species is affected by pseudouridines in the tRNA anticodon stem-loop.

Jurgenstein K, Tagel M, Ilves H, Leppik M, Kivisaar M, Remme J RNA Biol. 2022; 19(1):1050-1058.

PMID: 36093925 PMC: 9481147. DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2022.2121447.


Stop Codon Usage as a Window into Genome Evolution: Mutation, Selection, Biased Gene Conversion and the TAG Paradox.

Ho A, Hurst L Genome Biol Evol. 2022; 14(8).

PMID: 35867377 PMC: 9348620. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evac115.


40S ribosome profiling reveals distinct roles for Tma20/Tma22 (MCT-1/DENR) and Tma64 (eIF2D) in 40S subunit recycling.

Young D, Meydan S, Guydosh N Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):2976.

PMID: 34016977 PMC: 8137927. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23223-8.


References
1.
Mottagui-Tabar S, Tuite M, ISAKSSON L . The influence of 5' codon context on translation termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur J Biochem. 1998; 257(1):249-54. DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2570249.x. View

2.
Chavatte L, Frolova L, Kisselev L, Favre A . The polypeptide chain release factor eRF1 specifically contacts the s(4)UGA stop codon located in the A site of eukaryotic ribosomes. Eur J Biochem. 2001; 268(10):2896-904. DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2001.02177.x. View

3.
Namy O, Hatin I, Rousset J . Impact of the six nucleotides downstream of the stop codon on translation termination. EMBO Rep. 2001; 2(9):787-93. PMC: 1084031. DOI: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve176. View

4.
Klaholz B, Pape T, Zavialov A, Myasnikov A, Orlova E, Vestergaard B . Structure of the Escherichia coli ribosomal termination complex with release factor 2. Nature. 2003; 421(6918):90-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature01225. View

5.
Grentzmann G, Ingram J, Kelly P, GESTELAND R, Atkins J . A dual-luciferase reporter system for studying recoding signals. RNA. 1998; 4(4):479-86. PMC: 1369633. View