» Articles » PMID: 38674712

Differential Selection for Translation Efficiency Shapes Translation Machineries in Bacterial Species

Overview
Journal Microorganisms
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2024 Apr 27
PMID 38674712
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Different bacterial species have dramatically different generation times, from 20-30 min in to about two weeks in . The translation machinery in a cell needs to synthesize all proteins for a new cell in each generation. The three subprocesses of translation, i.e., initiation, elongation, and termination, are expected to be under stronger selection pressure to optimize in short-generation bacteria (SGB) such as than in the long-generation . The initiation efficiency depends on the start codon decoded by the initiation tRNA, the optimal Shine-Dalgarno (SD) decoded by the anti-SD (aSD) sequence on small subunit rRNA, and the secondary structure that may embed the initiation signals and prevent them from being decoded. The elongation efficiency depends on the tRNA pool and codon usage. The termination efficiency in bacteria depends mainly on the nature of the stop codon and the nucleotide immediately downstream of the stop codon. By contrasting SGB with long-generation bacteria (LGB), we predict (1) SGB to have more ribosome RNA operons to produce ribosomes, and more tRNA genes for carrying amino acids to ribosomes, (2) SGB to have a higher percentage of genes using AUG as the start codon and UAA as the stop codon than LGB, (3) SGB to exhibit better codon and anticodon adaptation than LGB, and (4) SGB to have a weaker secondary structure near the translation initiation signals than LGB. These differences between SGB and LGB should be more pronounced in highly expressed genes than the rest of the genes. We present empirical evidence in support of these predictions.

References
1.
Poole E, Major L, Mannering S, Tate W . Translational termination in Escherichia coli: three bases following the stop codon crosslink to release factor 2 and affect the decoding efficiency of UGA-containing signals. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26(4):954-60. PMC: 147352. DOI: 10.1093/nar/26.4.954. View

2.
Dryselius R, Izutsu K, Honda T, Iida T . Differential replication dynamics for large and small Vibrio chromosomes affect gene dosage, expression and location. BMC Genomics. 2008; 9:559. PMC: 2612033. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-559. View

3.
Chithambaram S, Prabhakaran R, Xia X . Differential codon adaptation between dsDNA and ssDNA phages in Escherichia coli. Mol Biol Evol. 2014; 31(6):1606-17. PMC: 4032129. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu087. View

4.
Akashi H . Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics. 1994; 136(3):927-35. PMC: 1205897. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/136.3.927. View

5.
Steitz J, Jakes K . How ribosomes select initiator regions in mRNA: base pair formation between the 3' terminus of 16S rRNA and the mRNA during initiation of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975; 72(12):4734-8. PMC: 388805. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.72.12.4734. View