» Articles » PMID: 16606435

Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy Versus Surgical Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2006 Apr 12
PMID 16606435
Citations 141
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Tracheostomy is one of the more commonly performed procedures in critically ill patients yet the optimal method of performing tracheostomies in this population remains to be established. The aim of this study was to systematically review and quantitatively synthesize all randomized clinical trials (RCTs), comparing elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) and surgical tracheostomy (ST) in adult critically ill patients with regards to major short and long term outcomes.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Additionally, bibliographies and selected conference proceedings were reviewed, and experts in the field and manufacturers of two PDT kits were contacted. Randomized clinical trials comparing any method of elective PDT to ST that included critically ill adults and reported at least one clinically relevant outcome were included. Data extracted included trial characteristics, measures of study validity, and clinically relevant outcomes.

Results: Seventeen RCTs involving 1,212 patients were included. Most PDTs used a multiple dilator technique and were performed in the intensive care unit (ICU). The pooled odds ratio (OR) for wound infection was 0.28 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16 to 0.49, p < 0.0005), indicating a significant reduction with PDT compared to ST. Overall, PDT was equivalent to ST for bleeding, major peri-procedural and long-term complications; however, subgroup analysis suggested PDT resulted in a lower incidence of bleeding (OR = 0.29 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.75, p = 0.01)) and death (OR = 0.71 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.0, p = 0.05)) when the STs were performed in the operating theatre.

Conclusion: PDT reduces the overall incidence of wound infection and may further reduce clinical relevant bleeding and mortality when compared with ST performed in the operating theatre. PDT, performed in the ICU, should be considered the procedure of choice for performing elective tracheostomies in critically ill adult patients.

Citing Articles

Enhancing Mucus Flow and Clearance by Grafting Zwitterionic Hydrogel Films to Luminal Surfaces.

Horne R, Escudero C, Ellerman M, Guymon C, Hansen M Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025; 10(2):e70118.

PMID: 40061206 PMC: 11886986. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.70118.


Intubation Versus Tracheotomy Outcomes in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients in Low-Resource Settings: What Do We Know?.

Kovacevic P, Baric G, Dragic S, Momcicevic D, Zlojutro B, Jandric M J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941648 PMC: 11818589. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030978.


Antiplatelet and anticoagulation use and risk of bleeding from percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy insertion: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Brown M, Elsawy F, Allison B, McGrath B J Intensive Care Soc. 2025; :17511437251314298.

PMID: 39911516 PMC: 11791969. DOI: 10.1177/17511437251314298.


Early versus late tracheostomy in people with multiple trauma.

Ansems K, Aleksandrova E, Steinfeld E, Metzendorf M, Skoetz N, Benstoem C Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 5:CD015932.

PMID: 39908070 PMC: 11091947. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015932.


Safety Analysis of Visual Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Neurocritical Care Patients with Anticoagulation and Antithrombosis.

Guo X, Han Q, Chen Q, Shan M, She R, Yang K Neurocrit Care. 2025; .

PMID: 39825159 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-024-02191-z.


References
1.
Freeman B, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman T . A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest. 2000; 118(5):1412-8. DOI: 10.1378/chest.118.5.1412. View

2.
Wu J, Huang M, Tang G, Shih S, Yang C, Kao W . Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy versus open tracheostomy--a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Chin Med Assoc. 2003; 66(8):467-73. View

3.
Dollner R, Verch M, Schweiger P, Deluigi C, Graf B, Wallner F . Laryngotracheoscopic findings in long-term follow-up after Griggs tracheostomy. Chest. 2002; 122(1):206-12. DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.1.206. View

4.
Antonelli M, Michetti V, Di Palma A, Conti G, Pennisi M, Arcangeli A . Percutaneous translaryngeal versus surgical tracheostomy: A randomized trial with 1-yr double-blind follow-up. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(5):1015-20. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000163401.77581.86. View

5.
Rumbak M, Newton M, Truncale T, Schwartz S, Adams J, Hazard P . A prospective, randomized, study comparing early percutaneous dilational tracheotomy to prolonged translaryngeal intubation (delayed tracheotomy) in critically ill medical patients. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32(8):1689-94. DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000134835.05161.b6. View