» Articles » PMID: 38496131

Impact of Vertical and Horizontal Skin Incisions on Outcome Measures in Tracheostomies

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 Mar 18
PMID 38496131
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tracheostomy is a life-saving procedure in which an opening is created in the anterior wall of the trachea. Different skin incision types are administered in tracheostomy procedures, predominantly vertical and horizontal. Various literature on the skin incision types in tracheostomy had contradictory findings, with different studies observing that one skin incision type had better outcomes than its counterpart. Hence the objective of this study was to compare the outcomes associated with vertical and horizontal skin incisions in patients undergoing tracheostomy. Method The present study assessed the outcome measures between the two incision types (vertical and horizontal) in tracheostomy. A prospective longitudinal study was done based on an academic tertiary hospital in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. Participants above 18 years who underwent tracheostomy were enrolled in the study and followed up over six months during intraoperative, immediate, within seven days, and long-term periods. Result In intraoperative complications, bleeding was most common (n = 15, 16.7%), followed by passage of tube into false tract (n = 6, 6.7%) and saturation drop (n = 2, 2.2%). Immediate complications comprised T-tube blockage (n = 4, 4.4%) and bleeding (n = 1, 1.1%). Complications within seven days occurred only in the horizontal group in which stomal site ulceration (n = 4, 6.7%) and delayed bleeding (n = 2, 3.3%) was seen, and one participant had unintended decannulation. In the long term, complications observed were stomal granulation (n = 9, 19.1%), dysphagia (n = 7, 14.9%), and unintended decannulation (n = 4, 8.5%). Conclusion In the current study, the most common intraoperative complication was bleeding, the immediate complication was tube dislodgement, and tracheostomy site ulcer was the most common complication within seven days, similar to the literature findings.

References
1.
Ferro A, Kotecha S, Auzinger G, Yeung E, Fan K . Systematic review and meta-analysis of tracheostomy outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 59(9):1013-1023. PMC: 8130586. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.05.011. View

2.
Lim S, Kwack W, Kim Y, Lee Y, Park J, Yoon H . Comparison of outcomes between vertical and transverse skin incisions in percutaneous tracheostomy for critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2018; 22(1):246. PMC: 6164179. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-2174-y. View

3.
Enrichi C, Battel I, Zanetti C, Koch I, Ventura L, Palmer K . Clinical Criteria for Tracheostomy Decannulation in Subjects with Acquired Brain Injury. Respir Care. 2017; 62(10):1255-1263. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.05470. View

4.
Bishnoi T, Sahu P, Arjun A . Evaluation of Factors Determining Tracheostomy Decannulation Failure Rate in Adults: An Indian Perspective Descriptive Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020; 74(Suppl 3):4849-4854. PMC: 7380661. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-01982-y. View

5.
Mehta Y, Mehta C . Percutaneous tracheostomy. Ann Card Anaesth. 2017; 20(1):121. PMC: 5290686. DOI: 10.4103/0971-9784.197854. View