» Articles » PMID: 16485136

Polymorphisms in DNA Double-strand Break Repair Genes and Risk of Breast Cancer: Two Population-based Studies in USA and Poland, and Meta-analyses

Abstract

The double-strand break DNA repair pathway has been implicated in breast carcinogenesis. We evaluated the association between 19 polymorphisms in seven genes in this pathway (XRCC2, XRCC3, BRCA2, ZNF350, BRIP1, XRCC4, LIG4) and breast cancer risk in two population-based studies in USA (3,368 cases and 2,880 controls) and Poland (1,995 cases and 2,296 controls). These data suggested weak associations with breast cancer risk for XRCC3 T241M and IVS7-14A>G (pooled odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.18 (1.04-1.34) and 0.85 (0.73-0.98) for homozygous variant vs wild-type genotypes, respectively), and for an uncommon variant in ZNF350 S472P (1.24 (1.05-1.48)), with no evidence for study heterogeneity. The remaining variants examined had no significant relationships to breast cancer risk. Meta-analyses of studies in Caucasian populations, including ours, provided some support for a weak association for homozygous variants for XRCC3 T241M (1.16 (1.04-1.30); total of 10,979 cases and 10,423 controls) and BRCA2 N372H (1.13 (1.10-1.28); total of 13,032 cases and 13,314 controls), and no support for XRCC2 R188H (1.06 (0.59-1.91); total of 8,394 cases and 8,404 controls). In conclusion, the genetic variants evaluated are unlikely to have a substantial overall association with breast cancer risk; however, weak associations are possible for XRCC3 (T241M and IVS7-14A>G), BRCA2 N372H, and ZNF350 S472P. Evaluation of potential underlying gene-gene interactions or associations in population subgroups will require even larger sample sizes.

Citing Articles

Interaction of breast cancer-relevant DNA repair genes and air pollution in relation to breast cancer risk in UK biobank.

Smotherman C, Sprague B, Braithwaite D, Yaghjyan L Am J Cancer Res. 2025; 14(12):5935-5951.

PMID: 39803660 PMC: 11711532. DOI: 10.62347/WNIY6250.


Clinico-genomic findings, molecular docking, and mutational spectrum in an understudied population with breast cancer patients from KP, Pakistan.

Ahmad H, Ali A, Khalil A, Ali R, Khan I, Khan M Front Genet. 2024; 15:1383284.

PMID: 38784039 PMC: 11111998. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1383284.


Association between XRCC2 Arg188His Polymorphism and Breast Cancer Susceptibility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dastgheib S, Sayad S, Azizi S, Hajizadeh N, Asadian F, Karimi-Zarchi M Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024; 25(1):43-55.

PMID: 38285766 PMC: 10911734. DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.1.43.


The Contribution of DNA Ligase 4 Polymorphisms to Colorectal Cancer.

Deng Y, Ke T, Yueh T, Chin Y, Wang Y, Hung Y In Vivo. 2023; 38(1):127-133.

PMID: 38148049 PMC: 10756467. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13419.


Relationship between polymorphisms in homologous recombination repair genes RAD51 G172T、XRCC2 & XRCC3 and risk of breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Yu J, Wang C Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1047336.

PMID: 36761956 PMC: 9903134. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1047336.


References
1.
Freedman M, Penney K, Stram D, Le Marchand L, Hirschhorn J, Kolonel L . Common variation in BRCA2 and breast cancer risk: a haplotype-based analysis in the Multiethnic Cohort. Hum Mol Genet. 2004; 13(20):2431-41. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddh270. View

2.
Cox D, Hankinson S, Hunter D . No association between BRCA2 N372H and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14(5):1353-4. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0848. View

3.
Han J, Hankinson S, Ranu H, De Vivo I, Hunter D . Polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer risk in the Nurses' Health Study. Carcinogenesis. 2003; 25(2):189-95. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgh002. View

4.
Begg C, Mazumdar M . Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994; 50(4):1088-101. View

5.
Webb P, Hopper J, Newman B, Chen X, Kelemen L, Giles G . Double-strand break repair gene polymorphisms and risk of breast or ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14(2):319-23. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0335. View