Relationship Between Patient Complaints and Surgical Complications

Overview

Journal Qual Saf Health Care

Specialty Health Services

Date 2006 Feb 4

PMID 16456204

Citations 16

Authors

H J Murff

D J France

J Blackford

E L Grogan

C Yu

T Speroff

J W Pichert

G B Hickson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Patient complaints are associated with increased malpractice risk but it is unclear if complaints might be associated with medical complications. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an association exists between patient complaints and surgical complications.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 16,713 surgical admissions was conducted over a 54 month period at a single academic medical center. Surgical complications were identified using administrative data. The primary outcome measure was unsolicited patient complaints.

Results: During the study period 0.9% of surgical admissions were associated with a patient complaint. 19% of admissions associated with a patient complaint included a postoperative complication compared with 12.5% of admissions without a patient complaint (p = 0.01). After adjusting for surgical specialty, co-morbid illnesses and length of stay, admissions with complications had an odds ratio of 1.74 (95% confidence interval 1.01 to 2.98) of being associated with a complaint compared with admissions without complications.

Conclusions: Admissions with surgical complications are more likely to be associated with a complaint than surgical admissions without complications. Further research is necessary to determine if patient complaints might serve as markers for poor clinical outcomes.

Citing Articles

Professionalism in Physician Assistant Education as a Predictor of Future Licensing Board Disciplinary Actions.

Barry C, Coombs J, Buchs S, Kim S, Grant T, Henry T J Physician Assist Educ. 2023; 34(4):278-282.

PMID: 37467183 PMC: 10653293. DOI: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000515.

Testing the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool in a Specialist Pediatric Hospital to Assess Potential Utility for Organizational Learning from Complaints.

Wray J, Williams C, Oldham G J Patient Exp. 2022; 9:23743735221106594.

PMID: 35734468 PMC: 9208030. DOI: 10.1177/23743735221106594.

Prioritizing the Interview in Selecting Resident Applicants: Behavioral Interviews to Determine Goodness of Fit.

Prystowsky M, Cadoff E, Lo Y, Hebert T, Steinberg J Acad Pathol. 2021; 8:23742895211052885.

PMID: 34722866 PMC: 8552388. DOI: 10.1177/23742895211052885.

Can compliment and complaint data inform the care of individuals with chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH)?.

Jones K, Davies B, Stubbs D, Komashie A, Burnstein R, Hutchinson P BMJ Open Qual. 2021; 10(3).

PMID: 34535455 PMC: 8451295. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001246.

An Analysis of Complaints in Two Large Tertiary University Teaching Hospital ENT Departments: A Two-Year Retrospective Review.

Bujoreanu I, Hariri A, Acharya V, Taghi A Int J Otolaryngol. 2020; 2020:1484687.

PMID: 32280347 PMC: 7142350. DOI: 10.1155/2020/1484687.

References

Blendon R, DesRoches C, Brodie M, Benson J, Rosen A, Schneider E . Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(24):1933-40. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa022151. View

Hickson G, Federspiel C, Pichert J, Miller C, Bost P . Patient complaints and malpractice risk. JAMA. 2002; 287(22):2951-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.22.2951. View

Hickson G, Clayton E, Githens P, Sloan F . Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. JAMA. 1992; 267(10):1359-63. View

Hickson G, Clayton E, Entman S, Miller C, Githens P, Sloan F . Obstetricians' prior malpractice experience and patients' satisfaction with care. JAMA. 1994; 272(20):1583-7. View

Entman S, Glass C, Hickson G, Githens P, Sloan F . The relationship between malpractice claims history and subsequent obstetric care. JAMA. 1994; 272(20):1588-91. View

Brennan T, Sox C, Burstin H . Relation between negligent adverse events and the outcomes of medical-malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335(26):1963-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199612263352606. View

Levinson W, Roter D, Mullooly J, Dull V, Frankel R . Physician-patient communication. The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA. 1997; 277(7):553-9. DOI: 10.1001/jama.277.7.553. View

Pichert J, Miller C, Hollo A, Federspiel C, Hickson G . What health professionals can do to identify and resolve patient dissatisfaction. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998; 24(6):303-12. DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30382-0. View

Pichert J, Federspiel C, Hickson G, Miller C, Gray C . Identifying medical center units with disproportionate shares of patient complaints. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999; 25(6):288-99. DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30445-x. View

10.

Weingart S, Toth M, Eneman J, Aronson M, Sands D, Ship A . Lessons from a patient partnership intervention to prevent adverse drug events. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004; 16(6):499-507. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh083. View

11.

Weingart S, Gandhi T, Seger A, Seger D, Borus J, Burdick E . Patient-reported medication symptoms in primary care. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165(2):234-40. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.2.234. View

12.

Weingart S, Wilson R, Gibberd R, Harrison B . Epidemiology of medical error. BMJ. 2000; 320(7237):774-7. PMC: 1117772. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.774. View

13.

Weingart S, Iezzoni L, Davis R, Palmer R, Cahalane M, Hamel M . Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program. Med Care. 2000; 38(8):796-806. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200008000-00004. View

14.

McCarthy E, Iezzoni L, Davis R, Palmer R, Cahalane M, Hamel M . Does clinical evidence support ICD-9-CM diagnosis coding of complications?. Med Care. 2000; 38(8):868-76. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200008000-00010. View

15.

Morris Jr J, Carrillo Y, Jenkins J, Smith P, Bledsoe S, Pichert J . Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough. Ann Surg. 2003; 237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. PMC: 1514679. DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26. View