What Can We Learn from Patient Claims? - A Retrospective Analysis of Incidence and Patterns of Adverse Events After Orthopaedic Procedures in Sweden

Overview

Journal Patient Saf Surg

Publisher Biomed Central

Date 2012 Jan 24

PMID 22264241

Citations 4

Authors

Annica Ohrn

Johan Elfstrom

Hans Tropp

Hans Rutberg

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Objective data on the incidence and pattern of adverse events after orthopaedic surgical procedures remain scarce, secondary to the reluctance for encompassing reporting of surgical complications. The aim of this study was to analyze the nature of adverse events after orthopaedic surgery reported to a national database for patient claims in Sweden.

Methods: In this retrospective review data from two Swedish national databases during a 4-year period were analyzed. We used the "County Councils' Mutual Insurance Company", a national no-fault insurance system for patient claims, and the "National Patient Register at the National Board of Health and Welfare".

Results: A total of 6,029 patient claims filed after orthopaedic surgery were assessed during the study period. Of those, 3,336 (55%) were determined to be adverse events, which received financial compensation. Hospital-acquired infections and sepsis were the most common causes of adverse events (n = 741; 22%). The surgical procedure that caused the highest rate of adverse events was "decompression of spinal cord and nerve roots" (code ABC**), with 168 adverse events of 17,507 hospitals discharges (1%). One in five (36 of 168; 21.4%) injured patient was seriously disabled or died.

Conclusions: We conclude that patients undergoing spinal surgery run the highest risk of being severely injured and that these patients also experienced a high degree of serious disability. The most common adverse event was related to hospital acquired infections. Claims data obtained in a no-fault system have a high potential for identifying adverse events and learning from them.

Citing Articles

Deep Surgical Site Infection after Fracture Has a Profound Effect on Functional Outcomes.

Gitajn I, Werth P, Carlini A, Bosse M, Gary J, Firoozabadi R JB JS Open Access. 2024; 9(1).

PMID: 38196850 PMC: 10773708. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00042.

Association of Postoperative Infections After Fractures With Long-term Income Among Adults.

OHara N, Daniel Mullins C, Slobogean G, Harris A, Kringos D, Klazinga N JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(4):e216673.

PMID: 33871615 PMC: 8056283. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6673.

Compensation claims after knee cartilage surgery is rare. A registry-based study from Scandinavia from 2010 to 2015.

Aae T, Lian O, Aroen A, Engebretsen L, Randsborg P BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21(1):287.

PMID: 32384890 PMC: 7206764. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03311-4.

Incidence and preventability of adverse events in an orthopaedic unit: a prospective analysis of four thousand, nine hundred and six admissions.

Rajasekaran S, Ravi S, Aiyer S Int Orthop. 2016; 40(11):2233-2238.

PMID: 27585910 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3282-4.

References

Vincent C, Davy C, Esmail A, Neale G, Elstein M, Cozens J . Learning from litigation. The role of claims analysis in patient safety. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006; 12(6):665-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00634.x. View

Murff H, France D, Blackford J, Grogan E, Yu C, Speroff T . Relationship between patient complaints and surgical complications. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15(1):13-6. PMC: 2564001. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.013847. View

Sari A, Sheldon T, Cracknell A, Turnbull A, Dobson Y, Grant C . Extent, nature and consequences of adverse events: results of a retrospective casenote review in a large NHS hospital. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007; 16(6):434-9. PMC: 2653177. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021154. View

Hove L, Bock J, Christoffersen J, Andreasson B . Analysis of 136 ureteral injuries in gynecological and obstetrical surgery from completed insurance claims. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 89(1):82-6. DOI: 10.3109/00016340903433974. View

Kable A, Gibberd R, Spigelman A . Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002; 14(4):269-76. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/14.4.269. View

Rogers Jr S, Gawande A, Kwaan M, Puopolo A, Yoon C, Brennan T . Analysis of surgical errors in closed malpractice claims at 4 liability insurers. Surgery. 2006; 140(1):25-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.01.008. View

Ohrn A, Elfstrom J, Liedgren C, Rutberg H . Reporting of sentinel events in Swedish hospitals: a comparison of severe adverse events reported by patients and providers. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011; 37(11):495-501. DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37063-8. View

Neily J, Mills P, Eldridge N, Dunn E, Samples C, Turner J . Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room. Arch Surg. 2009; 144(11):1028-34. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.126. View

Bismark M, Brennan T, Paterson R, DAVIS P, Studdert D . Relationship between complaints and quality of care in New Zealand: a descriptive analysis of complainants and non-complainants following adverse events. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15(1):17-22. PMC: 2563994. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015743. View

10.

Unbeck M, Muren O, Lillkrona U . Identification of adverse events at an orthopedics department in Sweden. Acta Orthop. 2008; 79(3):396-403. DOI: 10.1080/17453670710015319. View

11.

Jena A, Seabury S, Lakdawalla D, Chandra A . Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(7):629-36. PMC: 3204310. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa1012370. View

12.

Soop M, Fryksmark U, Koster M, Haglund B . The incidence of adverse events in Swedish hospitals: a retrospective medical record review study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009; 21(4):285-91. PMC: 2712321. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp025. View

13.

Kirschner S, Lutzner J, Gunther K, Eberlein-Gonska M, Krummenauer F . Adverse events in total knee arthroplasty: Results of a physician independent survey in 260 patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2010; 4(1):12. PMC: 2928185. DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-4-12. View

14.

Wong D, Herndon J, Canale S, Brooks R, Hunt T, Epps H . Medical errors in orthopaedics. Results of an AAOS member survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(3):547-57. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01439. View

15.

Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M . Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review. BMJ. 2001; 322(7285):517-9. PMC: 26554. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7285.517. View

16.

Baker G, Norton P, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J . The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ. 2004; 170(11):1678-86. PMC: 408508. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1040498. View

17.

Leape L, Brennan T, Laird N, Lawthers A, Localio A, BARNES B . The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324(6):377-84. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240605. View

18.

Pukk-Harenstam K, Ask J, Brommels M, Thor J, Penaloza R, Gaffney F . Analysis of 23 364 patient-generated, physician-reviewed malpractice claims from a non-tort, blame-free, national patient insurance system: lessons learned from Sweden. Postgrad Med J. 2009; 85(1000):69-73. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022897. View

19.

Imagama S, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Ohara T, Matsubara Y, Kanemura T . Perioperative complications and adverse events after lumbar spinal surgery: evaluation of 1012 operations at a single center. J Orthop Sci. 2011; 16(5):510-5. DOI: 10.1007/s00776-011-0123-6. View

20.

Rubin G, Dean A, Schwartz H . Orthopaedic malpractice claims in the VA medical system. J South Orthop Assoc. 2003; 12(2):56-9. View