» Articles » PMID: 32280347

An Analysis of Complaints in Two Large Tertiary University Teaching Hospital ENT Departments: A Two-Year Retrospective Review

Overview
Date 2020 Apr 14
PMID 32280347
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The aim of this paper is to review and analyse complaints received by the ENT department of two large teaching hospitals in London in order to determine current trends and mitigate future challenges.

Method: All complaints registered with the Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) from the ENT Department at our institution were collected between June 2016 and August 2018. Demographic information was collated and complaints were analysed and interpreted as per a standardised coding taxonomy.

Results: A total of 242 complaints were collected. Most (91.7%) were logged by patients themselves with a mean age of 48.3 (range 3-98 years). The majority were directed at the administrative team (52%) followed by management (23.5%) and then clinicians (16.9%). Administrative issues were the most common (50.1%) followed by clinical (25.1%) and relationship/communication (24.7%). The bulk of complaints focused on delays in access to services and treatment in the form of cancellations and long appointment waiting times (37%).

Conclusion: There has been a significant shift in complaints themes from clinical issues to administrative issues. This may reflect increasing financial and staffing pressures in the NHS. Complaints analysis is key in quality improvement and a cross-specialty integrated filing system in concordance with the recently proposed taxonomy would ease future collection and analysis of data.

Citing Articles

Testing the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool in a Specialist Pediatric Hospital to Assess Potential Utility for Organizational Learning from Complaints.

Wray J, Williams C, Oldham G J Patient Exp. 2022; 9:23743735221106594.

PMID: 35734468 PMC: 9208030. DOI: 10.1177/23743735221106594.


Professional quality of life and caring behaviours among clinical nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Inocian E, Cruz J, Alshehry A, Alshamlani Y, Ignacio E, Tumala R J Clin Nurs. 2021; .

PMID: 34231269 PMC: 8446991. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15937.

References
1.
Murff H, France D, Blackford J, Grogan E, Yu C, Speroff T . Relationship between patient complaints and surgical complications. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15(1):13-6. PMC: 2564001. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.013847. View

2.
Reader T, Gillespie A, Roberts J . Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014; 23(8):678-89. PMC: 4112446. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437. View

3.
Dyer C . All public services must learn lessons from Mid Staffs on handling complaints, MPs say. BMJ. 2014; 348:g2776. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g2776. View

4.
Kmietowicz Z . Winter pressure: government responses across UK. BMJ. 2018; 360:k113. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k113. View

5.
Piette J, Marinec N, Janda K, Morgan E, Schantz K, Aruquipa Yujra A . Structured Caregiver Feedback Enhances Engagement and Impact of Mobile Health Support: A Randomized Trial in a Lower-Middle-Income Country. Telemed J E Health. 2015; 22(4):261-8. PMC: 4968278. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0099. View