» Articles » PMID: 1627900

Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Normal Women: a Cross-sectional Study of 717 Finnish Volunteers

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 1992 May 1
PMID 1627900
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 717 healthy women aged 20-70 years. The maximal mean BMD was found at the age of 35-39 years in the spine and at the age of 20-24 in the femoral neck and Ward's triangle. No significant change in lumbar BMD was found from the age of 20 to 39 years. The spinal BMD values were relatively stable from age 20 to 39 years, whereas a linear decrease in BMD in the femoral neck and Ward's triangle was already apparent in the youngest age group (20-24 years). The major fall in BMD in all sites was related to the menopause. The overall decreases in BMD from the peak values to those at age 65-70 years were 20.4%, 19.0% and 32.6% in the lumbar spine, femoral neck and Ward's triangle, respectively. The correlation of trochanteric BMD with age was poor. BMD was positively correlated with weight in all measurement sites. Nulliparity was found to be a risk factor for osteoporosis. The present study confirmed that the menopause has a significant effect not only on spinal BMD but also on femoral BMD. Lumbar BMD was lower and BMDs in the proximal femur were higher in Finnish women than in white American women. This emphasizes the importance of national reference values for BMD measurements.

Citing Articles

A Comprehensive Analysis of Bone Mineral Density Changes across the Lifespan: Insights from National Surveys.

Li T, Huang G, Hou D, Cheng Y, Zhang T, Liang Y Nutrients. 2024; 16(16).

PMID: 39203940 PMC: 11356834. DOI: 10.3390/nu16162804.


The diagnostic cut-off points for components of sarcopenia in Finnish Caucasian women: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

Sjoblom S, Suuronen J, Rikkonen T, Honkanen R, Kroger H, Sirola J J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2023; 8(4):211-220.

PMID: 38046438 PMC: 10690131. DOI: 10.22540/JFSF-08-211.


Estimations of bone mineral density defined osteoporosis prevalence and cutpoint T-score for defining osteoporosis among older Chinese population: a framework based on relative fragility fracture risks.

Wang Y, Xiao B Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(9):4346-4360.

PMID: 36060578 PMC: 9403581. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-281.


Detecting pathological features and predicting fracture risk from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images using deep learning.

Nissinen T, Suoranta S, Saavalainen T, Sund R, Hurskainen O, Rikkonen T Bone Rep. 2021; 14:101070.

PMID: 33997147 PMC: 8102403. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101070.


Association of protein intake with the change of lean mass among elderly women: The Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention - Fracture Prevention Study (OSTPRE-FPS).

Isanejad M, Mursu J, Sirola J, Kroger H, Rikkonen T, Tuppurainen M J Nutr Sci. 2016; 4:e41.

PMID: 26793306 PMC: 4709835. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2015.31.


References
1.
Rodin A, Murby B, Smith M, Caleffi M, Fentiman I, Chapman M . Premenopausal bone loss in the lumbar spine and neck of femur: a study of 225 Caucasian women. Bone. 1990; 11(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(90)90064-6. View

2.
Laitinen K, Valimaki M, Keto P . Bone mineral density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in healthy Finnish women. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991; 48(4):224-31. DOI: 10.1007/BF02556372. View

3.
Pocock N, Eisman J, Mazess R, Sambrook P, Yeates M, Freund J . Bone mineral density in Australia compared with the United States. J Bone Miner Res. 1988; 3(6):601-4. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650030604. View

4.
Strause L, Bracker M, Saltman P, Sartoris D, Kerr E . A comparison of quantitative dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int. 1989; 45(5):288-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF02556021. View

5.
Balseiro J, Fahey F, Ziessman H, Le T . Comparison of bone mineral density in both hips. Radiology. 1988; 167(1):151-3. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.167.1.3347717. View