Functional Coverage of the Human Genome by Existing Structures, Structural Genomics Targets, and Homology Models
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The bias in protein structure and function space resulting from experimental limitations and targeting of particular functional classes of proteins by structural biologists has long been recognized, but never continuously quantified. Using the Enzyme Commission and the Gene Ontology classifications as a reference frame, and integrating structure data from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), target sequences from the structural genomics projects, structure homology derived from the SUPERFAMILY database, and genome annotations from Ensembl and NCBI, we provide a quantified view, both at the domain and whole-protein levels, of the current and projected coverage of protein structure and function space relative to the human genome. Protein structures currently provide at least one domain that covers 37% of the functional classes identified in the genome; whole structure coverage exists for 25% of the genome. If all the structural genomics targets were solved (twice the current number of structures in the PDB), it is estimated that structures of one domain would cover 69% of the functional classes identified and complete structure coverage would be 44%. Homology models from existing experimental structures extend the 37% coverage to 56% of the genome as single domains and 25% to 31% for complete structures. Coverage from homology models is not evenly distributed by protein family, reflecting differing degrees of sequence and structure divergence within families. While these data provide coverage, conversely, they also systematically highlight functional classes of proteins for which structures should be determined. Current key functional families without structure representation are highlighted here; updated information on the "most wanted list" that should be solved is available on a weekly basis from http://function.rcsb.org:8080/pdb/function_distribution/index.html.
Saikat A Genomics Inform. 2023; 21(2):e25.
PMID: 37415455 PMC: 10326535. DOI: 10.5808/gi.23001.
Obaidullah A, Alanazi M, Alsaif N, Alanazi A, Albassam H, Az A Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 2022:8037488.
PMID: 35140801 PMC: 8820870. DOI: 10.1155/2022/8037488.
Heterogeneous Multi-Layered Network Model for Omics Data Integration and Analysis.
Lee B, Zhang S, Poleksic A, Xie L Front Genet. 2020; 10:1381.
PMID: 32063919 PMC: 6997577. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01381.
Raasakka A, Linxweiler H, Brophy P, Sherman D, Kursula P Front Mol Neurosci. 2019; 12:84.
PMID: 31024253 PMC: 6465933. DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00084.
Szklarczyk D, Gable A, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 47(D1):D607-D613.
PMID: 30476243 PMC: 6323986. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1131.