» Articles » PMID: 20850544

The Utility of Geometrical and Chemical Restraint Information Extracted from Predicted Ligand-binding Sites in Protein Structure Refinement

Overview
Journal J Struct Biol
Date 2010 Sep 21
PMID 20850544
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Exhaustive exploration of molecular interactions at the level of complete proteomes requires efficient and reliable computational approaches to protein function inference. Ligand docking and ranking techniques show considerable promise in their ability to quantify the interactions between proteins and small molecules. Despite the advances in the development of docking approaches and scoring functions, the genome-wide application of many ligand docking/screening algorithms is limited by the quality of the binding sites in theoretical receptor models constructed by protein structure prediction. In this study, we describe a new template-based method for the local refinement of ligand-binding regions in protein models using remotely related templates identified by threading. We designed a Support Vector Regression (SVR) model that selects correct binding site geometries in a large ensemble of multiple receptor conformations. The SVR model employs several scoring functions that impose geometrical restraints on the Cα positions, account for the specific chemical environment within a binding site and optimize the interactions with putative ligands. The SVR score is well correlated with the RMSD from the native structure; in 47% (70%) of the cases, the Pearson's correlation coefficient is >0.5 (>0.3). When applied to weakly homologous models, the average heavy atom, local RMSD from the native structure of the top-ranked (best of top five) binding site geometries is 3.1Å (2.9Å) for roughly half of the targets; this represents a 0.1 (0.3)Å average improvement over the original predicted structure. Focusing on the subset of strongly conserved residues, the average heavy atom RMSD is 2.6Å (2.3Å). Furthermore, we estimate the upper bound of template-based binding site refinement using only weakly related proteins to be ∼2.6Å RMSD. This value also corresponds to the plasticity of the ligand-binding regions in distant homologues. The Binding Site Refinement (BSR) approach is available to the scientific community as a web server that can be accessed at http://cssb.biology.gatech.edu/bsr/.

Citing Articles

In-silico analysis of caspase-3 and -7 proteases from blood-parasitic Schistosoma species (Trematoda) and their human host.

Kumar S, Biswal D, Tandon V Bioinformation. 2013; 9(9):456-63.

PMID: 23847399 PMC: 3705615. DOI: 10.6026/97320630009456.


Are predicted protein structures of any value for binding site prediction and virtual ligand screening?.

Skolnick J, Zhou H, Gao M Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2013; 23(2):191-7.

PMID: 23415854 PMC: 3659186. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.01.009.

References
1.
You L . Toward computational systems biology. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2004; 40(2):167-84. DOI: 10.1385/CBB:40:2:167. View

2.
Loewenstein Y, Raimondo D, Redfern O, Watson J, Frishman D, Linial M . Protein function annotation by homology-based inference. Genome Biol. 2009; 10(2):207. PMC: 2688287. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2009-10-2-207. View

3.
Koehl P, Delarue M . Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J Mol Biol. 1994; 239(2):249-75. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1366. View

4.
Sutherland J, Nandigam R, Erickson J, Vieth M . Lessons in molecular recognition. 2. Assessing and improving cross-docking accuracy. J Chem Inf Model. 2007; 47(6):2293-302. DOI: 10.1021/ci700253h. View

5.
Erickson J, Jalaie M, Robertson D, Lewis R, Vieth M . Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. J Med Chem. 2003; 47(1):45-55. DOI: 10.1021/jm030209y. View