» Articles » PMID: 15915949

Techniques and Parameters for Estimating Radiation Exposure and Dose in Cardiac Computed Tomography

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2005 May 27
PMID 15915949
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With increasing clinical use of cardiac CT imaging it is important that all health care providers referring for or administering such examinations are familiar with the concepts and values of radiation dosimetry in CT as well as with the basic principles of radiation protection. There are important technical differences pertinent to radiation dose between the CT scanner types that are currently being used for imaging of the heart and coronary arteries. As a result of these differences, the radiation dose typically is higher when a cardiac examination is performed with multidetector-row CT (MDCT) than when it is performed with electron beam CT. Several techniques have been described to reduce radiation dose of MDCT imaging by varying the X-ray tube current during a CT examination. The volume computed tomographic dose index (CTDIvol), the dose length product (DLP), and the effective dose (E) are the most useful parameters to describe and compare radiation doses received from cardiac CT examinations. When comparing radiation doses between scanning protocols and scanner types, the degree of image noise must be considered. Diagnostic, rather than aesthetic, quality of images should be the most important factor guiding the development of scanning protocols for cardiac CT imaging. Cardiac CT examinations should be ordered only by qualified health care providers, and the ordering clinicians should be aware of their responsibility of weighing risks of the radiation exposure against the expected benefits.

Citing Articles

Comparative study of true and virtual non-contrast imaging generated from dual-layer spectral CT in patients with upper aerodigestive tract cancer.

Mingkwansook V, Puwametwongsa K, Watcharakorn A, Dechasasawat T Pol J Radiol. 2023; 87:e678-e687.

PMID: 36643004 PMC: 9834071. DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2022.123829.


The associated factors for radiation dose variation in cardiac CT angiography.

Alhailiy A, Ekpo E, Kench P, Ryan E, Brennan P, McEntee M Br J Radiol. 2019; 92(1096):20180793.

PMID: 30633548 PMC: 6886289. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180793.


Coronary CTA using scout-based automated tube potential and current selection algorithm, with breast displacement results in lower radiation exposure in females compared to males.

Vadvala H, Kim P, Mayrhofer T, Pianykh O, Kalra M, Hoffmann U Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2015; 4(6):470-9.

PMID: 25610804 PMC: 4278037. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.12.07.


Visual grading characteristics and ordinal regression analysis during optimisation of CT head examinations.

Zarb F, McEntee M, Rainford L Insights Imaging. 2014; 6(3):393-401.

PMID: 25510470 PMC: 4444791. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-014-0374-9.


Individually adapted coronary 64-slice CT angiography based on precontrast attenuation values, using different kVp and tube current settings: evaluation of image quality.

Paul J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 27 Suppl 1:53-9.

PMID: 22005891 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9960-9.


References
1.
Kalender W, Wolf H, Suess C . Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys. 1999; 26(11):2248-53. DOI: 10.1118/1.598738. View

2.
Morin R, Gerber T, McCollough C . Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation. 2003; 107(6):917-22. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000048965.56529.c2. View

3.
Shope T, GAGNE R, Johnson G . A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys. 1981; 8(4):488-95. DOI: 10.1118/1.594995. View

4.
Deibler A, Kuzo R, Vohringer M, Page E, Safford R, Patron J . Imaging of congenital coronary anomalies with multislice computed tomography. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004; 79(8):1017-23. DOI: 10.4065/79.8.1017. View

5.
Pavlicek W, Horton J, Turco R . Evaluation of the MDH Industries, Inc. pencil chamber for direct beam CT measurements. Health Phys. 1979; 37(6):773-4. View