» Articles » PMID: 15788102

Evolutionary Cores of Domain Co-occurrence Networks

Overview
Journal BMC Evol Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2005 Mar 25
PMID 15788102
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The modeling of complex systems, as disparate as the World Wide Web and the cellular metabolism, as networks has recently uncovered a set of generic organizing principles: Most of these systems are scale-free while at the same time modular, resulting in a hierarchical architecture. The structure of the protein domain network, where individual domains correspond to nodes and their co-occurrences in a protein are interpreted as links, also falls into this category, suggesting that domains involved in the maintenance of increasingly developed, multicellular organisms accumulate links. Here, we take the next step by studying link based properties of the protein domain co-occurrence networks of the eukaryotes S. cerevisiae, C. elegans, D. melanogaster, M. musculus and H. sapiens.

Results: We construct the protein domain co-occurrence networks from the PFAM database and analyze them by applying a k-core decomposition method that isolates the globally central (highly connected domains in the central cores) from the locally central (highly connected domains in the peripheral cores) protein domains through an iterative peeling process. Furthermore, we compare the subnetworks thus obtained to the physical domain interaction network of S. cerevisiae. We find that the innermost cores of the domain co-occurrence networks gradually grow with increasing degree of evolutionary development in going from single cellular to multicellular eukaryotes. The comparison of the cores across all the organisms under consideration uncovers patterns of domain combinations that are predominately involved in protein functions such as cell-cell contacts and signal transduction. Analyzing a weighted interaction network of PFAM domains of yeast, we find that domains having only a few partners frequently interact with these, while the converse is true for domains with a multitude of partners. Combining domain co-occurrence and interaction information, we observe that the co-occurrence of domains in the innermost cores (globally central domains) strongly coincides with physical interaction. The comparison of the multicellular eukaryotic domain co-occurrence networks with the single celled of S. cerevisiae (the overlap network) uncovers small, connected network patterns.

Conclusion: We hypothesize that these patterns, consisting of the domains and links preserved through evolution, may constitute nucleation kernels for the evolutionary increase in proteome complexity. Combining co-occurrence and physical interaction data we argue that the driving force behind domain fusions is a collective effect caused by the number of interactions and not the individual interaction frequency.

Citing Articles

Domain Architecture Based Methods for Comparative Functional Genomics Toward Therapeutic Drug Target Discovery.

Gollapalli P, Rudrappa S, Kumar V, Santosh Kumar H J Mol Evol. 2023; 91(5):598-615.

PMID: 37626222 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-023-10129-w.


Co-occurrence of enzyme domains guides the discovery of an oxazolone synthetase.

de Rond T, Asay J, Moore B Nat Chem Biol. 2021; 17(7):794-799.

PMID: 34099916 PMC: 8238888. DOI: 10.1038/s41589-021-00808-4.


MyCLADE: a multi-source domain annotation server for sequence functional exploration.

Vicedomini R, Blachon C, Oteri F, Carbone A Nucleic Acids Res. 2021; 49(W1):W452-W458.

PMID: 34023906 PMC: 8262732. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab395.


Network and pathway-based analyses of genes associated with osteoporosis.

Gu H, Huang Z, Chen G, Zhou K, Zhang Y, Chen J Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(8):e19120.

PMID: 32080087 PMC: 7034680. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019120.


PlaPPISite: a comprehensive resource for plant protein-protein interaction sites.

Yang X, Yang S, Qi H, Wang T, Li H, Zhang Z BMC Plant Biol. 2020; 20(1):61.

PMID: 32028878 PMC: 7006421. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-2254-4.


References
1.
Aravind L, Dixit V, Koonin E . Apoptotic molecular machinery: vastly increased complexity in vertebrates revealed by genome comparisons. Science. 2001; 291(5507):1279-84. DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5507.1279. View

2.
Apic G, Gough J, Teichmann S . Domain combinations in archaeal, eubacterial and eukaryotic proteomes. J Mol Biol. 2001; 310(2):311-25. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4776. View

3.
Doolittle R . The multiplicity of domains in proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1995; 64:287-314. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bi.64.070195.001443. View

4.
Wuchty S . Interaction and domain networks of yeast. Proteomics. 2002; 2(12):1715-23. DOI: 10.1002/1615-9861(200212)2:12<1715::AID-PROT1715>3.0.CO;2-O. View

5.
Park J, Lappe M, Teichmann S . Mapping protein family interactions: intramolecular and intermolecular protein family interaction repertoires in the PDB and yeast. J Mol Biol. 2001; 307(3):929-38. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4526. View