» Articles » PMID: 11273711

Mapping Protein Family Interactions: Intramolecular and Intermolecular Protein Family Interaction Repertoires in the PDB and Yeast

Overview
Journal J Mol Biol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2001 Mar 29
PMID 11273711
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the postgenomic era, one of the most interesting and important challenges is to understand protein interactions on a large scale. The physical interactions between protein domains are fundamental to the workings of a cell: in multi-domain polypeptide chains, in multi-subunit proteins and in transient complexes between proteins that also exist independently. To study the large-scale patterns and evolution of interactions between protein domains, we view interactions between protein domains in terms of the interactions between structural families of evolutionarily related domains. This allows us to classify 8151 interactions between individual domains in the Protein Data Bank and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in terms of 664 types of interactions, between protein families. At least 51 interactions do not occur in the Protein Data Bank and can only be derived from the yeast data. The map of interactions between protein families has the form of a scale-free network, meaning that most protein families only interact with one or two other families, while a few families are extremely versatile in their interactions and are connected to many families. We observe that almost half of all known families engage in interactions with domains from their own family. We also see that the repertoires of interactions of domains within and between polypeptide chains overlap mostly for two specific types of protein families: enzymes and same-family interactions. This suggests that different types of protein interaction repertoires exist for structural, functional and regulatory reasons.

Citing Articles

Domain Architecture Based Methods for Comparative Functional Genomics Toward Therapeutic Drug Target Discovery.

Gollapalli P, Rudrappa S, Kumar V, Santosh Kumar H J Mol Evol. 2023; 91(5):598-615.

PMID: 37626222 DOI: 10.1007/s00239-023-10129-w.


Structures of distantly related interacting protein homologs are less divergent than non-interacting homologs.

Naveenkumar N, Prabantu V, Vishwanath S, Sowdhamini R, Srinivasan N FEBS Open Bio. 2022; 12(12):2147-2153.

PMID: 36148593 PMC: 9714365. DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.13492.


Comparative Genomics: Insights on the Pathogenicity and Lifestyle of .

Mat Razali N, Hisham S, Kumar I, Shukla R, Lee M, Abu Bakar M Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(4).

PMID: 33671736 PMC: 7926851. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22042183.


A multidrug ABC transporter with a taste for GTP.

Orelle C, Durmort C, Mathieu K, Duchene B, Aros S, Fenaille F Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):2309.

PMID: 29396536 PMC: 5797166. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20558-z.


Binding Direction-Based Two-Dimensional Flattened Contact Area Computing Algorithm for Protein-Protein Interactions.

Kang B, Pugalendhi G, Kim K Molecules. 2017; 22(10).

PMID: 29027921 PMC: 6151622. DOI: 10.3390/molecules22101722.