Neuromuscular Adaptations to Detraining Following Resistance Training in Previously Untrained Subjects

Overview

Journal Eur J Appl Physiol

Specialty Physiology

Date 2005 Feb 11

PMID 15702342

Citations 21

Authors

Lars L Andersen

Jesper L Andersen

S Peter Magnusson

Per Aagaard

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Resistance training has been shown to considerably increase strength and neural drive during maximal eccentric muscle contraction; however, less is known about the adaptive change induced by subsequent detraining. The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of dynamic resistance training followed by detraining on changes in maximal eccentric and concentric isokinetic muscle strength, as well as to examine the corresponding adaptations in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and EMG activity. Maximal concentric and eccentric isokinetic knee extensor moment of force was measured in 13 young sedentary males (age 23.5+/-3.2 years), before and after 3 months of heavy resistance training and again after 3 months of detraining. Following training, moment of force increased during slow eccentric (50%, P<0.001), fast eccentric (25%, P<0.01), slow concentric (19%, P<0.001) and fast concentric contraction (11%, P<0.05). Corresponding increases in EMG were observed during eccentric and slow concentric contraction. Significant correlations were observed between the training-induced changes in moment of force and EMG (R(2)=0.33-0.77). Muscle CSA (measured by MRI) increased by 10% (P<0.001). After 3 months of detraining maximal muscle strength and EMG remained preserved during eccentric contraction but not concentric contraction. The present findings suggest that heavy resistance training induces long-lasting strength gains and neural adaptations during maximal eccentric muscle contraction in previously untrained subjects.

Citing Articles

Effect of Different Reduced Training Frequencies After 12 Weeks of Concurrent Ballistic and Aerobic Training on Muscle Power and Triceps Brachii Muscle Architecture.

Mpampoulis T, Methenitis S, Stasinaki A, Zaras N, Bogdanis G, Terzis G J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025; 10(1.

PMID: 39846678 PMC: 11755545. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk10010037.

Effect of Different Reduced Training Frequencies after 12 Weeks of Concurrent Resistance and Aerobic Training on Muscle Strength and Morphology.

Mpampoulis T, Stasinaki A, Methenitis S, Zaras N, Bogdanis G, Terzis G Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39058089 PMC: 11280775. DOI: 10.3390/sports12070198.

Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation training on upper limb muscles strength and body composition in moderately trained males: A randomized controlled study.

Qin Y, Chen H, Liu X, Wu J, Zhang Y Front Public Health. 2022; 10:982062.

PMID: 36159315 PMC: 9501974. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.982062.

Lower Extremity and Trunk Electromyographic Muscle Activity During Performance of the Y-Balance Test on Stable and Unstable Surfaces.

Kaur N, Bhanot K, Ferreira G Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022; 17(3):483-492.

PMID: 35391869 PMC: 8975559. DOI: 10.26603/001c.32593.

Effects of dose de-escalation following testosterone treatment and evoked resistance exercise on body composition, metabolic profile, and neuromuscular parameters in persons with spinal cord injury.

Gorgey A, Khalil R, Gill R, Khan R, Adler R Physiol Rep. 2021; 9(21):e15089.

PMID: 34713983 PMC: 8554770. DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15089.

References

Paddon-Jones D, Leveritt M, Lonergan A, Abernethy P . Adaptation to chronic eccentric exercise in humans: the influence of contraction velocity. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001; 85(5):466-71. DOI: 10.1007/s004210100467. View

Aagaard P, Simonsen E, Trolle M, Bangsbo J, Klausen K . Isokinetic hamstring/quadriceps strength ratio: influence from joint angular velocity, gravity correction and contraction mode. Acta Physiol Scand. 1995; 154(4):421-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1995.tb09927.x. View

Staron R, LEONARDI M, Karapondo D, Malicky E, Falkel J, Hagerman F . Strength and skeletal muscle adaptations in heavy-resistance-trained women after detraining and retraining. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1991; 70(2):631-40. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.2.631. View

Romano C, Schieppati M . Reflex excitability of human soleus motoneurones during voluntary shortening or lengthening contractions. J Physiol. 1987; 390:271-84. PMC: 1192179. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016699. View

Moritani T, deVries H . Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med. 1979; 58(3):115-30. View

Houston M, Froese E, Valeriote S, Green H, Ranney D . Muscle performance, morphology and metabolic capacity during strength training and detraining: a one leg model. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1983; 51(1):25-35. DOI: 10.1007/BF00952534. View

Wickiewicz T, Roy R, Powell P, Perrine J, Edgerton V . Muscle architecture and force-velocity relationships in humans. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984; 57(2):435-43. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1984.57.2.435. View

Pinniger G, Nordlund M, Steele J, Cresswell A . H-reflex modulation during passive lengthening and shortening of the human triceps surae. J Physiol. 2001; 534(Pt 3):913-23. PMC: 2278740. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00913.x. View

Rutherford O, Jones D . The role of learning and coordination in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986; 55(1):100-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF00422902. View

10.

Colliander E, Tesch P . Responses to eccentric and concentric resistance training in females and males. Acta Physiol Scand. 1991; 141(2):149-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1991.tb09063.x. View

11.

Aagaard P, Andersen J, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Leffers A, Wagner A, Magnusson S . A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture. J Physiol. 2001; 534(Pt. 2):613-23. PMC: 2278719. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.t01-1-00613.x. View

12.

Narici M, Roi G, Landoni L, Minetti A, Cerretelli P . Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989; 59(4):310-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF02388334. View

13.

Jami L . Golgi tendon organs in mammalian skeletal muscle: functional properties and central actions. Physiol Rev. 1992; 72(3):623-66. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.3.623. View

14.

GREGORY J, Proske U . The responses of Golgi tendon organs to stimulation of different combinations of motor units. J Physiol. 1979; 295:251-62. PMC: 1279043. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012966. View

15.

Crago P, Houk J, Rymer W . Sampling of total muscle force by tendon organs. J Neurophysiol. 1982; 47(6):1069-83. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1982.47.6.1069. View

16.

McCarrick M, Kemp J . The effect of strength training and reduced training on rotator cuff musculature. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2000; 15 Suppl 1:S42-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(00)00060-7. View

17.

Bawa P . Neural control of motor output: can training change it?. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2002; 30(2):59-63. DOI: 10.1097/00003677-200204000-00003. View

18.

Karlsson S, Gerdle B . Mean frequency and signal amplitude of the surface EMG of the quadriceps muscles increase with increasing torque--a study using the continuous wavelet transform. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2001; 11(2):131-40. DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00046-8. View

19.

Suzuki H, Conwit R, Stashuk D, Santarsiero L, Metter E . Relationships between surface-detected EMG signals and motor unit activation. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34(9):1509-17. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200209000-00018. View

20.

Day S, Hulliger M . Experimental simulation of cat electromyogram: evidence for algebraic summation of motor-unit action-potential trains. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 86(5):2144-58. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.86.5.2144. View