» Articles » PMID: 15478748

Recognizing Cognates and Interlingual Homographs: Effects of Code Similarity in Language-specific and Generalized Lexical Decision

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2004 Oct 14
PMID 15478748
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In four experiments, we investigated how cross-linguistic overlap in semantics, orthography, and phonology affects bilingual word recognition in different variants of the lexical decision task. Dutch-English bilinguals performed a language-specific or a generalized lexical decision task including words that are spelled and/or pronounced the same in English and in Dutch and that matched one-language control words from both languages. In Experiments 1 and 3, "false friends" with different meanings in the two languages (e.g., spot) were presented, whereas in Experiments 2 and 4 cognates with the same meanings across languages (e.g., film) were presented. The language-specific Experiments 1 and 2 replicated and qualified an earlier study (Dijkstra, Grainger, & Van Heuven, 1999). In the generalized Experiment 3, participants reacted equally quickly on Dutch-English homographs and Dutch control words, indicating that their response was based primarily on the fastest available orthographic code (i.e., Dutch). In Experiment 4, cognates were recognized faster than English and Dutch controls, suggesting coactivation of the cognates' semantics. The nonword results indicate that the bilingual rejection procedure can, to some extent, be language specific. All results are discussed within the BIA+ (bilingual interactive activation) model for bilingual word recognition.

Citing Articles

Visual word recognition of Chinese-Japanese bilinguals: limited role of phonology.

Jiao Z, Du L, Wang Y, Li Y Front Psychol. 2024; 14:1318798.

PMID: 38239469 PMC: 10794726. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1318798.


Electrophysiological correlates of masked orthographic and phonological priming in Chinese-English bilinguals.

Zhang E, Li J, Zhang X, Li D, Cao H Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):16648.

PMID: 36198859 PMC: 9535002. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21072-z.


Speaker Accent Modulates the Effects of Orthographic and Phonological Similarity on Auditory Processing by Learners of English.

Frances C, Navarra-Barindelli E, Martin C Front Psychol. 2022; 13:892822.

PMID: 35664165 PMC: 9161262. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892822.


A Domain-General Monitoring Account of Bilingual Language Control in Recognition: The Role of Language Dominance and Bilingual Experience.

Wu R, Struys E Front Psychol. 2022; 13:854898.

PMID: 35496216 PMC: 9039186. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.854898.


The Influence of Cross-Linguistic Similarity and Language Background on Writing to Dictation.

Iniesta A, Rossi E, Bajo M, Paolieri D Front Psychol. 2021; 12:679956.

PMID: 34650467 PMC: 8505693. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679956.


References
1.
De Groot A, Delmaar P, Lupker S . The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: support for non-selective access to bilingual memory. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000; 53(2):397-428. DOI: 10.1080/713755891. View

2.
Gollan T, Forster K, Frost R . Translation priming with different scripts: masked priming with cognates and noncognates in Hebrew-English bilinguals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997; 23(5):1122-39. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.5.1122. View

3.
van Hell J, Dijkstra T . Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts. Psychon Bull Rev. 2003; 9(4):780-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196335. View

4.
Reimer J, Brown J, Lorsbach T . Orthographically mediated inhibition effects: evidence of activational feedback during visual word recognition. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001; 8(1):102-10. DOI: 10.3758/bf03196145. View

5.
Pexman P, Lupker S . Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects?. Can J Exp Psychol. 2000; 53(4):323-34. DOI: 10.1037/h0087320. View