Luke S, Brown T, Smith C, Gutierrez A, Tolley C, Ford O
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2024; 39(3):330-340.
PMID: 38882928
PMC: 11178288.
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2288319.
Larionova E, Rebreikina A, Martynova O
Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7585.
PMID: 38555413
PMC: 10981698.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58219-z.
Lim A, OBrien B, Onnis L
Behav Res Methods. 2023; 56(3):1283-1313.
PMID: 37553536
PMC: 10991026.
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-023-02094-5.
Larionova E, Martynova O
Front Psychol. 2022; 13:834852.
PMID: 35496180
PMC: 9046601.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834852.
Hevia-Tuero C, Incera S, Suarez-Coalla P
Front Psychol. 2022; 13:803518.
PMID: 35401334
PMC: 8987578.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.803518.
Chinese character handwriting: A large-scale behavioral study and a database.
Wang R, Huang S, Zhou Y, Cai Z
Behav Res Methods. 2019; 52(1):82-96.
PMID: 30805862
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01206-4.
Semantic Richness Effects in Syntactic Classification: The Role of Feedback.
Yap M, Pexman P
Front Psychol. 2016; 7:1394.
PMID: 27695431
PMC: 5023677.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01394.
A Computational Model of Linguistic Humor in Puns.
Kao J, Levy R, Goodman N
Cogn Sci. 2015; 40(5):1270-85.
PMID: 26235596
PMC: 5042108.
DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12269.
Semantic richness effects in lexical decision: The role of feedback.
Yap M, Lim G, Pexman P
Mem Cognit. 2015; 43(8):1148-67.
PMID: 26155967
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0536-0.
Friends and foes in the lexicon: homophone naming in aphasia.
Middleton E, Chen Q, Verkuilen J
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014; 41(1):77-94.
PMID: 25329091
PMC: 4293245.
DOI: 10.1037/a0037778.
Spatio-temporal dynamics of automatic processing of phonological information in visual words.
Wang X, Wu Y, Liu A, Wang P
Sci Rep. 2013; 3:3485.
PMID: 24336606
PMC: 6506442.
DOI: 10.1038/srep03485.
An abundance of riches: cross-task comparisons of semantic richness effects in visual word recognition.
Yap M, Pexman P, Wellsby M, Hargreaves I, Huff M
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012; 6:72.
PMID: 22529787
PMC: 3328122.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00072.
How a hobby can shape cognition: visual word recognition in competitive Scrabble players.
Hargreaves I, Pexman P, Zdrazilova L, Sargious P
Mem Cognit. 2011; 40(1):1-7.
PMID: 21837576
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-011-0137-5.
The homophone effect during visual word recognition in children: an fMRI study.
Newman S
Psychol Res. 2011; 76(3):280-91.
PMID: 21660483
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0347-2.
An ERP study on whether the P600 can reflect the presence of unexpected phonology.
Liu B, Jin Z, Wang Z, Xin S
Exp Brain Res. 2011; 212(3):399-408.
PMID: 21643716
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2739-3.
Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception.
Lacey S, Flueckiger P, Stilla R, Lava M, Sathian K
Neuroimage. 2009; 49(3):1977-90.
PMID: 19896540
PMC: 3073774.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.081.
Visual word recognition is accompanied by covert articulation: evidence for a speech-like phonological representation.
Eiter B, Inhoff A
Psychol Res. 2008; 72(6):666-74.
PMID: 18843502
PMC: 2710454.
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-008-0166-2.
Pseudohomophone effects provide evidence of early lexico-phonological processing in visual word recognition.
Braun M, Hutzler F, Ziegler J, Dambacher M, Jacobs A
Hum Brain Mapp. 2008; 30(7):1977-89.
PMID: 18726911
PMC: 6871151.
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20643.
Automatic semantic feedback during visual word recognition.
Reimer J, Lorsbach T, Bleakney D
Mem Cognit. 2008; 36(3):641-58.
PMID: 18491503
DOI: 10.3758/mc.36.3.641.
Is there an effect of print exposure on the word frequency effect and the neighborhood size effect?.
Sears C, Siakaluk P, Chow V, Buchanan L
J Psycholinguist Res. 2008; 37(4):269-91.
PMID: 18344000
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-008-9071-5.