» Articles » PMID: 15447886

Sensory-specific Satiety in Obese and Normal-weight Women

Overview
Journal Am J Clin Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2004 Sep 28
PMID 15447886
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sensory-specific satiety has been found to play an important role in food choice and meal termination, and it might be a factor contributing to obesity.

Objective: We hypothesized that obese and normal-weight people have different sensitivities to sensory-specific satiety for high-fat foods.

Design: Sensory-specific satiety was measured in 21 obese [x body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)): 33.1] and 23 normal-weight (BMI: 22.8) women who were matched for restrained eating behavior, physical activity, age, and smoking behavior. Food intake, appetite ratings, and liking scores before and after an ad libitum lunch were measured. Products differed in fat content and taste (ie, low-fat sweet, low-fat savory, high-fat sweet, and high-fat savory), and the subjects tested all 4 products. In the first study, sandwiches were tested; in the second study, snacks were tested.

Results: Sensory-specific satiety for all products was observed in both subject groups. No significant differences were observed between the obese and normal-weight subjects in either sensory-specific satiety or food intake for any of the products or product categories tested. Taste (sweet or savory) had a significantly (P < 0.05) stronger effect on sensory-specific satiety than did fat content. Appetite ratings strongly decreased after lunch, and appetite for a meal or snack after lunch was significantly higher in obese than in normal-weight subjects, whereas scores before lunch did not differ significantly.

Conclusions: Obese and normal-weight people do not differ in their sensitivity to sensory-specific satiety, and factors other than fat content have the greatest effect on sensory-specific satiety.

Citing Articles

Is obesity associated with taste alterations? a systematic review.

Peinado B, Frazao D, Bittencourt L, de Souza-Rodrigues R, Vidigal M, Teixeira da Silva D Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1167119.

PMID: 37334283 PMC: 10273260. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1167119.


Acute and repeated impact of sweeteners and sweetness enhancers in solid and semi-solid foods on appetite: protocol for a multicentre, cross-over, RCT in people with overweight/obesity - the SWEET Project.

Gibbons C, OHara B, OConnor D, Hardman C, Wilton M, Harrold J BMJ Open. 2022; 12(12):e063903.

PMID: 36564114 PMC: 9791453. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063903.


Effect of food variety on intake of a meal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Embling R, Pink A, Gatzemeier J, Price M, Lee M, Wilkinson L Am J Clin Nutr. 2021; 113(3):716-741.

PMID: 33515033 PMC: 7948867. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa352.


Low Calorie Sweetener (LCS) use and energy balance.

Peters J, Beck J Physiol Behav. 2016; 164(Pt B):524-528.

PMID: 27061939 PMC: 7664293. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.024.


Perceptual and Brain Response to Odors Is Associated with Body Mass Index and Postprandial Total Ghrelin Reactivity to a Meal.

Sun X, Veldhuizen M, Babbs A, Sinha R, Small D Chem Senses. 2016; 41(3):233-48.

PMID: 26826114 PMC: 4850930. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv081.