» Articles » PMID: 36564114

Acute and Repeated Impact of Sweeteners and Sweetness Enhancers in Solid and Semi-solid Foods on Appetite: Protocol for a Multicentre, Cross-over, RCT in People with Overweight/obesity - the SWEET Project

Abstract

Introduction: Intake of free sugars in European countries is high and attempts to reduce sugar intake have been mostly ineffective. Non-nutritive sweeteners and sweetness enhancers (S&SEs) can maintain sweet taste in the absence of energy, but little is known about the impact of acute and repeated consumption of S&SE in foods on appetite. This study aims to evaluate the effect of acute and repeated consumption of two individual S&SEs and two S&SE blends in semisolid and solid foods on appetite and related behavioural, metabolic and health outcomes.

Methods And Analysis: A work package of the SWEET Project; this study consists of five double-blind randomised cross-over trials which will be carried out at five sites across four European countries, aiming to have n=213. Five food matrices will be tested across three formulations (sucrose-sweetened control vs two reformulated products with S&SE blends and no added sugar). Participants (body mass index 25-35 kg/m; aged 18-60 years) will consume each formulation for 14 days. The primary endpoint is composite appetite score (hunger, inverse of fullness, desire to eat and prospective food consumption) over a 3-hour postprandial incremental area under the curve during clinical investigation days on days 1 and 14.

Ethics And Dissemination: The trial has been approved by national ethical committees and will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed open-access scientific journals. Research data from the trial will be deposited in an open-access online research data archive.

Trial Registration Number: NCT04633681.

Citing Articles

Acute and two-week effects of neotame, stevia rebaudioside M and sucrose-sweetened biscuits on postprandial appetite and endocrine response in adults with overweight/obesity-a randomised crossover trial from the SWEET consortium.

Gibbons C, Beaulieu K, Almiron-Roig E, Navas-Carretero S, Martinez J, OHara B EBioMedicine. 2024; 102:105005.

PMID: 38553262 PMC: 11026940. DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105005.


Comparing body composition between the sweet-liking phenotypes: experimental data, systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

Armitage R, Iatridi V, Sladekova M, Yeomans M Int J Obes (Lond). 2024; 48(6):764-777.

PMID: 38467727 PMC: 11129949. DOI: 10.1038/s41366-024-01494-7.

References
1.
Brunstrom J, Shakeshaft N, Scott-Samuel N . Measuring 'expected satiety' in a range of common foods using a method of constant stimuli. Appetite. 2008; 51(3):604-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.04.017. View

2.
Hunter S, Reister E, Cheon E, Mattes R . Low Calorie Sweeteners Differ in Their Physiological Effects in Humans. Nutrients. 2019; 11(11). PMC: 6893706. DOI: 10.3390/nu11112717. View

3.
Anguah K, Syed-Abdul M, Hu Q, Jacome-Sosa M, Heimowitz C, Cox V . Changes in Food Cravings and Eating Behavior after a Dietary Carbohydrate Restriction Intervention Trial. Nutrients. 2019; 12(1). PMC: 7019570. DOI: 10.3390/nu12010052. View

4.
Lasschuijt M, Mars M, de Graaf C, Smeets P . Endocrine Cephalic Phase Responses to Food Cues: A Systematic Review. Adv Nutr. 2020; 11(5):1364-1383. PMC: 7490153. DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa059. View

5.
Higgins K, Mattes R . A randomized controlled trial contrasting the effects of 4 low-calorie sweeteners and sucrose on body weight in adults with overweight or obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019; 109(5):1288-1301. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy381. View