» Articles » PMID: 15295413

Potential Utility of Rubidium 82 PET Quantification in Patients with 3-vessel Coronary Artery Disease

Overview
Journal J Nucl Cardiol
Date 2004 Aug 6
PMID 15295413
Citations 100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Standard perfusion imaging may underestimate the extent of disease in 3-vessel coronary atherosclerosis. This study determined whether positron emission tomography quantification of perfusion reserve by use of rubidium 82 net retention defined a greater extent of disease than the standard approach in patients with 3-vessel disease.

Methods And Results: Rb-82 net retention was quantified as an estimation of absolute perfusion at rest and with dipyridamole stress by use of dynamic positron emission tomography imaging. The percent of abnormal myocardial sectors, as compared with a normal database, for a standard and quantification approach was determined. Twenty-three patients were evaluated. Defect sizes were larger in patients with 3-vessel disease (n = 13) by use of quantification methods: 44% +/- 18% of the myocardial sectors were abnormal by use of the standard approach versus 69% +/- 24% of sectors when measured by quantification of the stress-rest perfusion difference (P =.008). In patients with single-vessel disease (n = 10), defect sizes were smaller with quantification methods.

Conclusions: Quantification of Rb-82 net retention to measure the stress-rest perfusion difference in the myocardium defined a greater extent of disease than the standard approach in this group of patients with triple-vessel disease. More accurate measurement of the extent of coronary artery disease could facilitate better risk stratification and identify more high-risk patients in whom aggressive intervention is required.

Citing Articles

Comparative evaluation of a novel [F] F-Labeled PET tracer XTR004 against [N] ammonia in myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease.

Wang P, Ren C, Wang L, Qian H, Li F, Su X Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; .

PMID: 39681776 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-07004-1.


Clinical Impact of Assessment of Myocardial Flow Reserve in Identifying the Cause of Chest Discomfort.

Lima R, Bezerra A, Daibes M, Domenico C, De Lorenzo A Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024; 121(6):e20230700.

PMID: 38985080 PMC: 11216331. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20230700.


The Influence of Kinetic Models and Attenuation Correction on Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (CZT SPECT)-Derived Myocardial Blood Flow and Reserve: Correlation with Invasive Angiography Data.

Mochula A, Maltseva A, Kopeva K, Grakova E, Mochula O, Zavadovsky K J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592092 PMC: 10932033. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051271.


The Application of Conditional Probability to Harmonize Nuclear Cardiology Test Results.

Christian T Ann Nucl Cardiol. 2023; 9(1):80-84.

PMID: 38058584 PMC: 10696142. DOI: 10.17996/anc.22-00174.


Integrated myocardial flow reserve (iMFR) assessment: optimized PET blood flow quantification for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Poitrasson-Riviere A, Moody J, Renaud J, Hagio T, Arida-Moody L, Buckley C Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023; 51(1):136-146.

PMID: 37807004 PMC: 11894525. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06455-2.


References
1.
Choi Y, Huang S, Hawkins R, Kuhle W, Dahlbom M, Hoh C . A simplified method for quantification of myocardial blood flow using nitrogen-13-ammonia and dynamic PET. J Nucl Med. 1993; 34(3):488-97. View

2.
Bergmann S, Fox K, RAND A, McElvany K, Welch M, Markham J . Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H215O. Circulation. 1984; 70(4):724-33. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.70.4.724. View

3.
Laine H, Raitakari O, Niinikoski H, Pitkanen O, Iida H, Viikari J . Early impairment of coronary flow reserve in young men with borderline hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32(1):147-53. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00222-8. View

4.
Nienaber C, Ratib O, Gambhir S, Krivokapich J, Huang S, Phelps M . A quantitative index of regional blood flow in canine myocardium derived noninvasively with N-13 ammonia and dynamic positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991; 17(1):260-9. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90736-s. View

5.
Sawada S, Muzik O, Beanlands R, Wolfe E, Hutchins G, Schwaiger M . Interobserver and interstudy variability of myocardial blood flow and flow-reserve measurements with nitrogen 13 ammonia-labeled positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 1995; 2(5):413-22. DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(05)80029-7. View