Li R, Edalati M, Muccigrosso D, Lau J, Laforest R, Woodard P
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2023; 25(1):35.
PMID: 37344848
PMC: 10286396.
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-023-00945-w.
Grist J, Bogh N, Hansen E, Schneider A, Healicon R, Ball V
Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):1613.
PMID: 36709217
PMC: 9884306.
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28643-8.
Gregg S, Keramida G, Peters A
Ann Nucl Med. 2021; 35(7):777-784.
PMID: 34076856
DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01591-x.
Monroy-Gonzalez A, Juarez-Orozco L, Han C, Vedder I, Garcia D, Borra R
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019; 27(4):1225-1233.
PMID: 30903608
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-019-01620-3.
Lu D, Yalcin H, Sivalokanathan S, Greenland G, Vasquez N, Yalcin F
J Nucl Cardiol. 2018; 27(6):2031-2043.
PMID: 30456498
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-01521-x.
Simplified quantification of PET myocardial blood flow: The need for technical standardization.
Moody J, Ficaro E, Murthy V
J Nucl Cardiol. 2018; 27(3):829-832.
PMID: 30397868
PMC: 6500765.
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-01497-8.
Relative Patlak plot for dynamic PET parametric imaging without the need for early-time input function.
Zuo Y, Qi J, Wang G
Phys Med Biol. 2018; 63(16):165004.
PMID: 30020080
PMC: 6133657.
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad444.
Stress Myocardial Blood Flow Heterogeneity Is a Positron Emission Tomography Biomarker of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
Lu D, Yalcin H, Yalcin F, Zhao M, Sivalokanathan S, Valenta I
Am J Cardiol. 2018; 121(9):1081-1089.
PMID: 29678336
PMC: 5966031.
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.01.022.
The precise physiological definition of tissue perfusion and clearance measured from imaging.
Peters A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018; 45(7):1139-1141.
PMID: 29607451
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-3982-7.
Comparison of two software systems for quantification of myocardial blood flow in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Yalcin H, Valenta I, Zhao M, Tahari A, Lu D, Higuchi T
J Nucl Cardiol. 2018; 26(4):1243-1253.
PMID: 29359273
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-017-1155-x.
Stress myocardial blood flow correlates with ventricular function and synchrony better than myocardial perfusion reserve: A Nitrogen-13 ammonia PET study.
Juarez-Orozco L, Alexanderson E, Dierckx R, Boersma H, Hillege J, Zeebregts C
J Nucl Cardiol. 2016; 25(3):797-806.
PMID: 27681955
PMC: 5966471.
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-016-0669-y.
PET-measured longitudinal flow gradient correlates with invasive fractional flow reserve in CAD patients.
Valenta I, Antoniou A, Marashdeh W, Leucker T, Kasper E, Jones S
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 18(5):538-548.
PMID: 27325812
PMC: 6279108.
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jew116.
Clinical use of quantitative cardiac perfusion PET: rationale, modalities and possible indications. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Committee of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).
Sciagra R, Passeri A, Bucerius J, Verberne H, Slart R, Lindner O
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016; 43(8):1530-45.
PMID: 26846913
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3317-5.
Relationship Between Quantitative Adverse Plaque Features From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Downstream Impaired Myocardial Flow Reserve by 13N-Ammonia Positron Emission Tomography: A Pilot Study.
Dey D, Diaz Zamudio M, Schuhbaeck A, Orozco L, Otaki Y, Gransar H
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8(10):e003255.
PMID: 26467104
PMC: 4939903.
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.115.003255.
Validation of pixel-wise parametric mapping of myocardial blood flow with ¹³NH₃ PET in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Sciagra R, Passeri A, Cipollini F, Castagnoli H, Olivotto I, Burger C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 42(10):1581-8.
PMID: 26121929
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3101-y.
Quantitative cardiac positron emission tomography: the time is coming!.
Sciagra R
Scientifica (Cairo). 2013; 2012:948653.
PMID: 24278760
PMC: 3820449.
DOI: 10.6064/2012/948653.
Characterizing the normal range of myocardial blood flow with ⁸²rubidium and ¹³N-ammonia PET imaging.
Renaud J, DaSilva J, Beanlands R, deKemp R
J Nucl Cardiol. 2013; 20(4):578-91.
PMID: 23657833
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-013-9721-3.
Quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Morton G, Chiribiri A, Ishida M, Hussain S, Schuster A, Indermuehle A
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(16):1546-55.
PMID: 22999722
PMC: 7611225.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.052.
Dynamic single photon emission computed tomography--basic principles and cardiac applications.
Gullberg G, Reutter B, Sitek A, Maltz J, Budinger T
Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55(20):R111-91.
PMID: 20858925
PMC: 3306016.
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/20/R01.
Acceleration of the direct reconstruction of linear parametric images using nested algorithms.
Wang G, Qi J
Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55(5):1505-17.
PMID: 20157226
PMC: 2952886.
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/5/016.