» Articles » PMID: 15293858

Signature-whistle Production in Undisturbed Free-ranging Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops Truncatus)

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2004 Aug 6
PMID 15293858
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Data from behavioural observations and acoustic recordings of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) were analysed to determine whether signature whistles are produced by wild undisturbed dolphins, and how whistle production varies with activity and group size. The study animals were part of a resident community of bottlenose dolphins near Sarasota, Florida, USA. This community of dolphins provides a unique opportunity for the study of signature-whistle production, since most animals have been recorded during capture-release events since 1975. Three mother-calf pairs and their associates were recorded for a total of 141.25 h between May and August of 1994 and 1995. Whistles of undisturbed dolphins were compared with those recorded from the same individuals during capture-release events. Whistles were conservatively classified into one of four categories: signature, probable signature, upsweep or other. For statistical analyses, signature and probable signature whistles were combined into a 'signature' category; upsweep and other whistles were combined into a 'non-signature' category. Both 'signature' and 'non-signature' whistle frequencies significantly increased as group size increased. There were significant differences in whistle frequencies across activity types: both 'signature' and 'non-signature' whistles were most likely to occur during socializing and least likely to occur during travelling. There were no significant interactions between group size and activity type. Signature and probable signature whistles made up ca. 52% of all whistles produced by these free-ranging bottlenose dolphins.

Citing Articles

Vocal signatures affected by population identity and environmental sound levels.

Fandel A, Silva K, Bailey H PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0299250.

PMID: 38635752 PMC: 11025965. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299250.


Observational study on the non-linear response of dolphins to the presence of vessels.

Diamant R, Testolin A, Shachar I, Galili O, Scheinin A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):6062.

PMID: 38480760 PMC: 10937978. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56654-6.


Determinants of variability in signature whistles of the Mediterranean common bottlenose dolphin.

La Manna G, Rako-Gospic N, Pace D, Bonizzoni S, Di Iorio L, Polimeno L Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):6980.

PMID: 35618794 PMC: 9135725. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-10920-7.


Vocal correlates of arousal in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) in human care.

Probert R, Bastian A, Elwen S, James B, Gridley T PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0250913.

PMID: 34469449 PMC: 8409691. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250913.


Five members of a mixed-sex group of bottlenose dolphins share a stereotyped whistle contour in addition to maintaining their individually distinctive signature whistles.

Jones B, Daniels R, Tufano S, Ridgway S PLoS One. 2020; 15(5):e0233658.

PMID: 32442214 PMC: 7244121. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233658.


References
1.
Janik . Pitfalls in the categorization of behaviour: a comparison of dolphin whistle classification methods. Anim Behav. 1999; 57(1):133-143. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0923. View

2.
Janik , Slater . Context-specific use suggests that bottlenose dolphin signature whistles are cohesion calls. Anim Behav. 1998; 56(4):829-838. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0881. View

3.
Sayigh , Tyack , Wells , Solow , Scott , Irvine . Individual recognition in wild bottlenose dolphins: a field test using playback experiments. Anim Behav. 1999; 57(1):41-50. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0961. View

4.
Altmann J . Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour. 1974; 49(3):227-67. DOI: 10.1163/156853974x00534. View

5.
Janik V . Whistle matching in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Science. 2000; 289(5483):1355-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5483.1355. View