» Articles » PMID: 24194893

The Encoding of Individual Identity in Dolphin Signature Whistles: How Much Information is Needed?

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2013 Nov 7
PMID 24194893
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) produce many vocalisations, including whistles that are unique to the individual producing them. Such "signature whistles" play a role in individual recognition and maintaining group integrity. Previous work has shown that humans can successfully group the spectrographic representations of signature whistles according to the individual dolphins that produced them. However, attempts at using mathematical algorithms to perform a similar task have been less successful. A greater understanding of the encoding of identity information in signature whistles is important for assessing similarity of whistles and thus social influences on the development of these learned calls. We re-examined 400 signature whistles from 20 individual dolphins used in a previous study, and tested the performance of new mathematical algorithms. We compared the measure used in the original study (correlation matrix of evenly sampled frequency measurements) to one used in several previous studies (similarity matrix of time-warped whistles), and to a new algorithm based on the Parsons code, used in music retrieval databases. The Parsons code records the direction of frequency change at each time step, and is effective at capturing human perception of music. We analysed similarity matrices from each of these three techniques, as well as a random control, by unsupervised clustering using three separate techniques: k-means clustering, hierarchical clustering, and an adaptive resonance theory neural network. For each of the three clustering techniques, a seven-level Parsons algorithm provided better clustering than the correlation and dynamic time warping algorithms, and was closer to the near-perfect visual categorisations of human judges. Thus, the Parsons code captures much of the individual identity information present in signature whistles, and may prove useful in studies requiring quantification of whistle similarity.

Citing Articles

Automatic detection for bioacoustic research: a practical guide from and for biologists and computer scientists.

Kershenbaum A, Akcay C, Babu-Saheer L, Barnhill A, Best P, Cauzinille J Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(2):620-646.

PMID: 39417330 PMC: 11885706. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13155.


Vocal complexity in a socially complex corvid: gradation, diversity and lack of common call repertoire in male rooks.

Martin K, Cornero F, Clayton N, Adam O, Obin N, Dufour V R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(1):231713.

PMID: 38204786 PMC: 10776222. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231713.


First acoustic evidence of signature whistle production by spinner dolphins (Stenella longirostris).

Rio R Anim Cogn. 2023; 26(6):1915-1927.

PMID: 37676587 DOI: 10.1007/s10071-023-01824-8.


Individual identity information persists in learned calls of introduced parrot populations.

Smith-Vidaurre G, Perez-Marrufo V, Hobson E, Salinas-Melgoza A, Wright T PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(7):e1011231.

PMID: 37498847 PMC: 10374045. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011231.


Deep audio embeddings for vocalisation clustering.

Best P, Paris S, Glotin H, Marxer R PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0283396.

PMID: 37428759 PMC: 10332598. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283396.


References
1.
Zeng F, Nie K, Stickney G, Kong Y, Vongphoe M, Bhargave A . Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(7):2293-8. PMC: 546014. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0406460102. View

2.
Fripp D, Owen C, Quintana-Rizzo E, Shapiro A, Buckstaff K, Jankowski K . Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) calves appear to model their signature whistles on the signature whistles of community members. Anim Cogn. 2004; 8(1):17-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-004-0225-z. View

3.
Janik , Slater . Context-specific use suggests that bottlenose dolphin signature whistles are cohesion calls. Anim Behav. 1998; 56(4):829-838. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0881. View

4.
Deecke V, Janik V . Automated categorization of bioacoustic signals: avoiding perceptual pitfalls. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 119(1):645-53. DOI: 10.1121/1.2139067. View

5.
Harley H . Whistle discrimination and categorization by the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): a review of the signature whistle framework and a perceptual test. Behav Processes. 2008; 77(2):243-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.11.002. View