» Articles » PMID: 23649908

Communication in Bottlenose Dolphins: 50 years of Signature Whistle Research

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2013 May 8
PMID 23649908
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) produce individually distinctive signature whistles that broadcast the identity of the caller. Unlike voice cues that affect all calls of an animal, signature whistles are distinct whistle types carrying identity information in their frequency modulation pattern. Signature whistle development is influenced by vocal production learning. Animals use a whistle from their environment as a model, but modify it, and thus invent a novel signal. Dolphins also copy signature whistles of others, effectively addressing the whistle owner. This copying occurs at low rates and the resulting copies are recognizable as such by parameter variations in the copy. Captive dolphins can learn to associate novel whistles with objects and use these whistles to report on the presence or absence of the object. If applied to signature whistles, this ability would make the signature whistle a rare example of a learned referential signal in animals. Here, we review the history of signature whistle research, covering definitions, acoustic features, information content, contextual use, developmental aspects, and species comparisons with mammals and birds. We show how these signals stand out amongst recognition calls in animals and how they contribute to our understanding of complexity in animal communication.

Citing Articles

Vocal usage learning and vocal comprehension learning in harbor seals.

Duengen D, Jadoul Y, Ravignani A BMC Neurosci. 2024; 25(1):48.

PMID: 39367300 PMC: 11451073. DOI: 10.1186/s12868-024-00899-4.


Vocal convergence and social proximity shape the calls of the most basal Passeriformes, New Zealand Wrens.

Moran I, Loo Y, Louca S, Young N, Whibley A, Withers S Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):575.

PMID: 38750083 PMC: 11096322. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06253-y.


Vocal signatures affected by population identity and environmental sound levels.

Fandel A, Silva K, Bailey H PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0299250.

PMID: 38635752 PMC: 11025965. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299250.


From emotional signals to symbols.

Griebel U, Oller D Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1135288.

PMID: 38629043 PMC: 11020113. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1135288.


Evidence for vocal signatures and voice-prints in a wild parrot.

Smeele S, Senar J, Aplin L, McElreath M R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(10):230835.

PMID: 37800160 PMC: 10548090. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230835.


References
1.
Mundinger P . Vocal imitation and individual recognition of finch calls. Science. 1970; 168(3930):480-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.168.3930.480. View

2.
Janik V . Whistle matching in wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Science. 2000; 289(5483):1355-7. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5483.1355. View

3.
Herman L, Richards D, Wolz J . Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins. Cognition. 1984; 16(2):129-219. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90003-9. View

4.
Janik , Slater . Context-specific use suggests that bottlenose dolphin signature whistles are cohesion calls. Anim Behav. 1998; 56(4):829-838. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0881. View

5.
Quick N, Janik V . Whistle rates of wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus): influences of group size and behavior. J Comp Psychol. 2008; 122(3):305-11. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.122.3.305. View