» Articles » PMID: 15272678

An Accurate Calibration Method of the Multileaf Collimator Valid for Conformal and Intensity Modulated Radiation Treatments

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2004 Jul 27
PMID 15272678
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because for IMRT treatments the required accuracy on leaf positioning is high, conventional calibration methods may not be appropriate. The aim of this study was to develop the tools for an accurate MLC calibration valid for conventional and IMRT treatments and to investigate the stability of the MLC. A strip test consisting of nine adjacent segments 2 cm wide, separated by 1 mm and exposed on Kodak X-Omat V films at Dmax depth, was used for detecting leaf-positioning errors. Dose profiles along the leaf-axis were taken for each leaf-pair. We measured the dose variation on each abutment to quantify the relative positioning error (RPE) and the absolute position of the abutment to quantify the absolute positioning error (APE). The accuracy of determining the APE and RPE was 0.15 and 0.04 mm, respectively. Using the RPE and the APE the MLC calibration parameters were calculated in order to obtain a flat profile on the abutment at the correct position. A conventionally calibrated Elekta MLC was re-calibrated using the strip test. The stability of the MLC and leaf-positioning reproducibility was investigated exposing films with 25 adjacent segments 1 cm wide during three months and measuring the standard deviation of the RPE values. A maximum shift over the three months of 0.27 mm was observed and the standard deviation of the RPE values was 0.11 mm.

Citing Articles

A novel EPID-based MLC QA method with log files achieving submillimeter accuracy.

Liu C, Wang B, Bai X, Cheng X, Wang X, Yang X J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(8):e14450.

PMID: 39031891 PMC: 11302811. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14450.


Leaf-individual calibration for a double stack multileaf collimator in photon radiotherapy.

Rippke C, Renkamp C, Attieh C, Schluter F, Buchele C, Debus J Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023; 27:100477.

PMID: 37635846 PMC: 10457557. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100477.


Acceptance procedure for the linear accelerator component of the 1.5 T MRI-linac.

Woodings S, de Vries J, Kok J, Hackett S, van Asselen B, Bluemink J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021; 22(8):45-59.

PMID: 34275176 PMC: 8364272. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13068.


A quantitative method to the analysis of MLC leaf position and speed based on EPID and EBT3 film for dynamic IMRT treatment with different types of MLC.

Li Y, Chen L, Zhu J, Wang B, Liu X J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017; 18(4):106-115.

PMID: 28517613 PMC: 7663986. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12102.


Quality control of VMAT synchronization using portal imaging.

Bedford J, Chajecka-Szczygielska H, Thomas M J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015; 16(1):5238.

PMID: 25679179 PMC: 5689994. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5238.