» Articles » PMID: 25679179

Quality Control of VMAT Synchronization Using Portal Imaging

Overview
Date 2015 Feb 14
PMID 25679179
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For accurate delivery of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), the gantry position should be synchronized with the multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf positions and the dose rate. This study, therefore, aims to implement quality control (QC) of VMAT synchronization, with as few arcs as possible and with minimal data handling time, using portal imaging. A steel bar of diameter 12 mm is accurately positioned in the G-T direction, 80 mm laterally from the isocenter. An arc prescription irradiates the bar with a 16 mm × 220 mm field during a complete 360° arc, so as to cast a shadow of the bar onto the portal imager. This results in a sinusoidal sweep of the field and shadow across the portal imager and back. The method is evaluated by simulating gantry position errors of 1°-9° at one control point, dose errors of 2 monitor units to 20 monitor units (MU) at one control point (0.3%-3% overall), and MLC leaf position errors of 1 mm - 6 mm at one control point. Inhomogeneity metrics are defined to characterize the synchronization of all leaves and of individual leaves with respect to the complete set. Typical behavior is also investigated for three models of accelerator. In the absence of simulated errors, the integrated images show uniformity, and with simulated delivery errors, irregular patterns appear. The inhomogeneity metrics increase by 67% due to a 4° gantry position error, 33% due to an 8 MU (1.25%) dose error, and 70% due to a 2 mm MLC leaf position error. The method is more sensitive to errors at gantry angle 90°/270° than at 0°/180° due to the geometry of the test. This method provides fast and effective VMAT QC suitable for inclusion in a monthly accelerator QC program. The test is able to detect errors in the delivery of individual control points, with the possibility of using movie images to further investigate suspicious image features.

Citing Articles

Feasibility and guidelines for the use of an injectable fiducial marker (BioXmark ) to improve target delineation in preclinical radiotherapy studies using mouse models.

Brown K, Ghita M, Prise K, Butterworth K F1000Res. 2024; 12:526.

PMID: 38799243 PMC: 11116939. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.130883.1.


In vivo dosimetry in external beam photon radiotherapy: Requirements and future directions for research, development, and clinical practice.

Olaciregui-Ruiz I, Beddar S, Greer P, Jornet N, McCurdy B, Paiva-Fonseca G Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021; 15:108-116.

PMID: 33458335 PMC: 7807612. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.08.003.


Evaluation of a Novel Liquid Fiducial Marker, BioXmark, for Small Animal Image-Guided Radiotherapy Applications.

Brown K, Ghita M, Schettino G, Prise K, Butterworth K Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(5).

PMID: 32443537 PMC: 7280978. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051276.


Dosimetric accuracy of dynamic couch rotation during volumetric modulated arc therapy (DCR-VMAT) for primary brain tumours.

Smyth G, Evans P, Bamber J, Mandeville H, Rollo Moore A, Welsh L Phys Med Biol. 2019; 64(8):08NT01.

PMID: 30808011 PMC: 6877349. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0a8e.


Recent developments in non-coplanar radiotherapy.

Smyth G, Evans P, Bamber J, Bedford J Br J Radiol. 2019; 92(1097):20180908.

PMID: 30694086 PMC: 6580906. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180908.

References
1.
Essers M, de Langen M, Dirkx M, Heijmen B . Commissioning of a commercially available system for intensity-modulated radiotherapy dose delivery with dynamic multileaf collimation. Radiother Oncol. 2001; 60(2):215-24. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00317-6. View

2.
Poludniowski G, Thomas M, Evans P, Webb S . CT reconstruction from portal images acquired during volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2010; 55(19):5635-51. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/19/002. View

3.
Wang Q, Dai J, Zhang K . A novel method for routine quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Med Phys. 2013; 40(10):101712. DOI: 10.1118/1.4820439. View

4.
Low D, Harms W, Mutic S, Purdy J . A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998; 25(5):656-61. DOI: 10.1118/1.598248. View

5.
Wang J, Hu W, Peng J, Lu S, Zhao J, Xiao Y . Identical Quality Assurance for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Elekta and Varian Machines. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2014; . DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500419. View