» Articles » PMID: 14715755

IS6110 Mediates Increased Transcription of the PhoP Virulence Gene in a Multidrug-resistant Clinical Isolate Responsible for Tuberculosis Outbreaks

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2004 Jan 13
PMID 14715755
Citations 55
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains is solely due to chromosomal mutations that could affect bacterial virulence. Molecular epidemiology studies have shown that resistant strains are less likely to be clustered than susceptible strains. However, a few multidrug-resistant (MDR) M. tuberculosis complex strains have been described as causing outbreaks, suggesting that they have restored virulence or increased transmission. One of the biggest MDR tuberculosis outbreaks documented to date was caused by the B strain of M. bovis. Restriction fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting revealed that the B strain contains two copies of IS6110. Here, we mapped and sequenced the regions flanking the two copies of IS6110 in the B strain. Ligation-mediated PCR showed that one of these IS6110 copies is located within the promoter region of phoP, a transcriptional regulator that is essential for M. tuberculosis virulence. We used PCR to screen 219 MDR M. tuberculosis complex strains (90.4% of all MDR isolates) isolated in Spain between 1998 and 2002 and found that the B strain was the only strain that contained a copy of IS6110 in the phoP promoter. To determine whether IS6110 affects phoP promoter activity in the B strain, we individually cloned the phoP gene and its promoter region (including IS6110 from the B strain and the equivalent region from M. tuberculosis without IS6110 as a control) into a mycobacterial replicative plasmid and transformed M. smegmatis with the resulting plasmid. Primer extension analysis showed that phoP transcription was strongly upregulated when the promoter region contained IS6110, as in the case of the B strain.

Citing Articles

Delineating the Acquired Genetic Diversity and Multidrug Resistance in Alcaligenes from Poultry Farms and Nearby Soil.

Bhattacharjee A, Singh A J Microbiol. 2024; 62(7):511-523.

PMID: 38904697 DOI: 10.1007/s12275-024-00129-w.


Genomic Characterization of IS Insertions in .

Refaya A, Vetrivel U, Palaniyandi K Evol Bioinform Online. 2024; 20:11769343241240558.

PMID: 38586439 PMC: 10996354. DOI: 10.1177/11769343241240558.


Characterisation of IS1311 in Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis genomes: Typing, continental clustering, microbial evolution and host adaptation.

Mizzi R, Plain K, Timms V, Marsh I, Whittington R PLoS One. 2024; 19(2):e0294570.

PMID: 38349924 PMC: 10863896. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294570.


Recent progress in the genotyping of bovine tuberculosis and its rapid diagnosis nanoparticle-based electrochemical biosensors.

Zahran M, El-Shabasy R, Elrashedy A, Mousa W, Nayel M, Salama A RSC Adv. 2023; 13(45):31795-31810.

PMID: 37908649 PMC: 10613952. DOI: 10.1039/d3ra05606f.


ESAT-6 a Major Virulence Factor of .

Anes E, Pires D, Mandal M, Azevedo-Pereira J Biomolecules. 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 37371548 PMC: 10296275. DOI: 10.3390/biom13060968.


References
1.
Sander P, Bottger E . Mycobacteria: genetics of resistance and implications for treatment. Chemotherapy. 1999; 45(2):95-108. DOI: 10.1159/000007171. View

2.
Movahedzadeh F, Gonzalez-Y-Merchand J, Cox R . Transcription start-site mapping. Methods Mol Med. 2011; 54:105-24. DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-147-7:105. View

3.
Fang Z, Forbes K . A Mycobacterium tuberculosis IS6110 preferential locus (ipl) for insertion into the genome. J Clin Microbiol. 1997; 35(2):479-81. PMC: 229605. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.35.2.479-481.1997. View

4.
Perez E, Samper S, Bordas Y, Guilhot C, Gicquel B, Martin C . An essential role for phoP in Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2001; 41(1):179-87. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02500.x. View

5.
Hohmann E, Oletta C, MILLER S . Evaluation of a phoP/phoQ-deleted, aroA-deleted live oral Salmonella typhi vaccine strain in human volunteers. Vaccine. 1996; 14(1):19-24. DOI: 10.1016/0264-410x(95)00173-x. View