From Annotated Genomes to Metabolic Flux Models and Kinetic Parameter Fitting
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Significant advances in system-level modeling of cellular behavior can be achieved based on constraints derived from genomic information and on optimality hypotheses. For steady-state models of metabolic networks, mass conservation and reaction stoichiometry impose linear constraints on metabolic fluxes. Different objectives, such as maximization of growth rate or minimization of flux distance from a reference state, can be tested in different organisms and conditions. In particular, we have suggested that the metabolic properties of mutant bacterial strains are best described by an algorithm that performs a minimization of metabolic adjustment (MOMA) upon gene deletion. The increasing availability of many annotated genomes paves the way for a systematic application of these flux balance methods to a large variety of organisms. However, such a high throughput goal crucially depends on our capacity to build metabolic flux models in a fully automated fashion. Here we describe a pipeline for generating models from annotated genomes and discuss the current obstacles to full automation. In addition, we propose a framework for the integration of flux modeling results and high throughput proteomic data, which can potentially help in the inference of whole-cell kinetic parameters.
Genome-Scale Reconstruction of Microbial Dynamic Phenotype: Successes and Challenges.
Panikov N Microorganisms. 2021; 9(11).
PMID: 34835477 PMC: 8621822. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9112352.
Evaluation of reaction gap-filling accuracy by randomization.
Latendresse M, Karp P BMC Bioinformatics. 2018; 19(1):53.
PMID: 29444634 PMC: 5813426. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2050-4.
Integrating transcriptional activity in genome-scale models of metabolism.
Trejo Banos D, Trebulle P, Elati M BMC Syst Biol. 2018; 11(Suppl 7):134.
PMID: 29322933 PMC: 5763306. DOI: 10.1186/s12918-017-0507-0.
Relationship between Metabolic Fluxes and Sequence-Derived Properties of Enzymes.
Zikmanis P, Kampenusa I Int Sch Res Notices. 2016; 2014:817102.
PMID: 27437461 PMC: 4897147. DOI: 10.1155/2014/817102.
Montezano D, Meek L, Gupta R, Bermudez L, Bermudez J PLoS One. 2015; 10(7):e0134014.
PMID: 26218987 PMC: 4517854. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134014.