» Articles » PMID: 12958270

Comparison and Evaluation of Real-time PCR, Real-time Nucleic Acid Sequence-based Amplification, Conventional PCR, and Serology for Diagnosis of Mycoplasma Pneumoniae

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2003 Sep 6
PMID 12958270
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia and lower-respiratory-tract infections. Diagnosis has traditionally been obtained by serological diagnosis, but increasingly, molecular techniques have been applied. However, the number of studies actually comparing these assays is limited. The development of a novel duplex real-time PCR assay for detection of M. pneumoniae in the presence of an internal control real-time PCR is described. In addition, real-time nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) on an iCycler apparatus is evaluated. These assays were compared to serology and a conventional PCR assay for 106 clinical samples from patients with lower-respiratory-tract infection. Of the 106 samples, 12 (11.3%) were positive by all the molecular methods whereas serology with acute sample and convalescent samples detected 6 (5.6%) and 9 (8.5%), respectively. Clinical symptoms of the patients with Mycoplasma-positive results were compared to those of the other patients with lower-respiratory-tract infections, and it was found that the results for mean lower age numbers as well as the presence of chills, increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and raised C-reactive protein levels showed significant differences. Molecular methods are superior for diagnosis of M. pneumoniae, providing more timely diagnosis. In addition, using real-time methods involves less hands-on time and affords the ability to monitor the reaction in the same tube.

Citing Articles

Real-time fluorescent multiple cross displacement amplification for rapid and sensitive detection.

Xiao F, Zhang Y, Xu W, Fu J, Huang X, Jia N Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024; 14:1423155.

PMID: 39176262 PMC: 11338879. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1423155.


Enhancing pathogen description and antibiotic regimen selection in community-acquired pneumonia through RT-qPCR assays.

Zhao N, Ren H, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Deng J, Jiang L Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1409065.

PMID: 38919501 PMC: 11196416. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1409065.


Exploring the Utility of Multiplex Infectious Disease Panel Testing for Diagnosis of Infection in Different Body Sites: A Joint Report of the Association for Molecular Pathology, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of....

Lewinski M, Alby K, Babady N, Butler-Wu S, Bard J, Greninger A J Mol Diagn. 2023; 25(12):857-875.

PMID: 37757952 PMC: 11702286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.08.005.


Development of a Multiplex RT-PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Four Potential Zoonotic Swine RNA Viruses.

Werid G, Zhang H, Ibrahim Y, Pan Y, Zhang L, Xu Y Vet Sci. 2022; 9(4).

PMID: 35448674 PMC: 9029180. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9040176.


Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens.

van Asten S, Boers S, de Groot J, Schuurman R, Claas E BMC Microbiol. 2021; 21(1):236.

PMID: 34445973 PMC: 8390116. DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02289-w.


References
1.
Dorigo-Zetsma J, Zaat S, Spanjaard L, Rijntjes J, van Waveren G, Jensen J . Comparison of PCR, culture, and serological tests for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory tract infection in children. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 37(1):14-7. PMC: 84154. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.37.1.14-17.1999. View

2.
Ieven M, Ursi D, Van Bever H, Quint W, Niesters H, Goossens H . Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by two polymerase chain reactions and role of M. pneumoniae in acute respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients. J Infect Dis. 1996; 173(6):1445-52. DOI: 10.1093/infdis/173.6.1445. View

3.
Ferwerda A, Moll H, de Groot R . Respiratory tract infections by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children: a review of diagnostic and therapeutic measures. Eur J Pediatr. 2001; 160(8):483-91. DOI: 10.1007/s004310100775. View

4.
De Barbeyrac B, Febrer F, Renaudin H, Dupon M, Bebear C . Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Mycoplasma genitalium in clinical samples by polymerase chain reaction. Clin Infect Dis. 1993; 17 Suppl 1:S83-9. DOI: 10.1093/clinids/17.supplement_1.s83. View

5.
Reznikov M, Blackmore T, Finlay-Jones J, Gordon D . Comparison of nasopharyngeal aspirates and throat swab specimens in a polymerase chain reaction-based test for Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995; 14(1):58-61. DOI: 10.1007/BF02112622. View