» Articles » PMID: 29508444

Evaluation of the Virclia Automated Chemiluminescent Immunoassay System for Diagnosing Pneumonia Caused by Mycoplasma Pneumoniae

Overview
Journal J Clin Lab Anal
Publisher Wiley
Date 2018 Mar 7
PMID 29508444
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mycoplasma pneumoniae is considered an important etiologic agent of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in outpatients. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a quick automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for M. pneumoniae in a population-based prospective study of CAP.

Methods: A total of 137 outpatients diagnosed with CAP were included in the study. Acute- and convalescent phase sera were analyzed for IgG and IgM to M. pneumoniae with both CLIA (VirClia ) and ELISA immunoassays. Conventional serological criteria by quantitative ELISA were considered as reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of the assay were assessed with the construction of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the kappa index was used to evaluate the accuracy of the IgG and IgM determinations in the acute phase.

Results: Thirty-eight patients were diagnosed with pneumonia by M. pneumoniae. ROC curves for IgG and IgM of convalescent and acute phase (C/A) quotients by the CLIA and ELISA assays were comparable. Specifically, for the CLIA, the best C/A quotient for IgG was 2.617 (sensitivity, 94.9%; specificity, 99.9%), and for IgM 1.400 (sensitivity, 65.8%; specificity, 100%). Regarding the acute phase, the best diagnostic accuracy for the CLIA was obtained with an IgG index of 1.120 (sensitivity, 89.5%; specificity, 73.7%). The CLIA was very simple to execute and required a minimum sample handling.

Conclusion: The accuracy of the Virclia assay for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection in outpatients with CAP was equivalent to the quantitative ELISA. The CLIA was quicker to perform and displayed better analytic workability than conventional ELISA.

Citing Articles

Seroprevalence of vector-borne pathogens in outdoor workers from southern Italy and associated occupational risk factors.

Stufano A, Iatta R, Sgroi G, Jahantigh H, Cagnazzo F, Floel A Parasit Vectors. 2022; 15(1):264.

PMID: 35879782 PMC: 9310498. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-022-05385-6.


Predictive Factors of the Responses to Treatment of Pneumonia.

Lee E, Lee Y J Clin Med. 2021; 10(6).

PMID: 33801856 PMC: 7998824. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061154.


High Seroprevalence of and among Scrub Typhus Patients in South Korea.

Hwang J, Jeon M, Kim C, Lee C Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019; 101(4):859-862.

PMID: 31436153 PMC: 6779216. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.19-0064.


Evaluation of the Virclia automated chemiluminescent immunoassay system for diagnosing pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

Ortiz de la Tabla V, Berruezo M, Garcia Paya E, Fernandez M, Garcia J, Masia M J Clin Lab Anal. 2018; 32(6):e22431.

PMID: 29508444 PMC: 6816995. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22431.

References
1.
Busson L, van den Wijngaert S, Dahma H, Decolvenaer M, Di Cesare L, Martin A . Evaluation of 10 serological assays for diagnosing Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013; 76(2):133-7. PMC: 7127255. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.02.027. View

2.
Daxboeck F, Krause R, Wenisch C . Laboratory diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003; 9(4):263-73. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00590.x. View

3.
Montagnani F, De Paolis F, Beghetto E, Gargano N . Use of recombinant chimeric antigens for the serodiagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010; 29(11):1377-86. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-010-1010-3. View

4.
Torres A, Peetermans W, Viegi G, Blasi F . Risk factors for community-acquired pneumonia in adults in Europe: a literature review. Thorax. 2013; 68(11):1057-65. PMC: 3812874. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204282. View

5.
Thurman K, Walter N, Schwartz S, Mitchell S, Dillon M, Baughman A . Comparison of laboratory diagnostic procedures for detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in community outbreaks. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48(9):1244-9. DOI: 10.1086/597775. View