Differential Regulation of Lipopolysaccharide-induced Monocyte Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and MMP-9 by P38 and Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase 1/2 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases
Overview
Affiliations
Signal transduction events in monocyte matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) production have been shown to include a PGE(2)-cAMP-dependent step. To determine earlier pathway components, we examined the role of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in the regulation of monocyte MMP-1 and MMP-9, two major MMPs induced by LPS. Stimulation with LPS resulted in the activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) and mitogen-activated kinase p38. The p38-specific inhibitor SB203580 suppressed p38 activity and MMP-1 mRNA and protein, but increased ERK activity and MMP-9 mRNA and protein. In contrast, the MAPK kinase 1/2-specific inhibitor PD98059 inhibited MMP-1 and MMP-9. However, both MAPK inhibitors decreased the production of cyclooxygenase-2 and PGE(2), but only the inhibition of MMP-1 by SB203580 was reversed by PGE(2) or dibutyryl cAMP. Examination of the effect of these MAPK inhibitors on the promoters of MMP-1 and MMP-9 revealed that PD98059 inhibited the binding of transcription factors to all of the MMP promoter-specific complementary oligonucleotides tested. However, SB203580 only inhibited the binding of MMP-1-specific CREB and SP 1 oligonucleotides, which was reversed by PGE(2). Additionally, SB203580 enhanced transcription factor binding to the oligonucleotides complementary to a NF-kappaB site in the promoter of MMP-9. Thus, LPS induction of MMP-1 production by monocytes is regulated by both ERK1/2 and p38, whereas MMP-9 stimulation occurred mainly through the ERK1/2 pathway. Moreover, p38 regulates MMP-1 mainly through a PGE(2)-dependent pathway, whereas ERK1/2-mediated MMP-1 and MMP-9 production involves the activation of additional MMP promoter sites through a PGE(2)-independent mechanism.
Nagasaka H, Kishida T, Kouro T, Igarashi Y, Takebe S, Yamamoto S Int J Clin Oncol. 2024; 29(6):832-839.
PMID: 38580797 PMC: 11130069. DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02477-4.
Rivero-Pino F, Grao-Cruces E, Lopez-Enriquez S, Alba G, Marquez-Paradas E, Claro-Cala C Nutrients. 2023; 15(4).
PMID: 36839300 PMC: 9959767. DOI: 10.3390/nu15040941.
Ampelopsin targets in cellular processes of cancer: Recent trends and advances.
Tuli H, Sak K, Garg V, Kumar A, Adhikary S, Kaur G Toxicol Rep. 2022; 9:1614-1623.
PMID: 36561961 PMC: 9764188. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.07.013.
Ahmad B, Gamallat Y, Khan M, Din S, Israr M, Ahmad M Onco Targets Ther. 2021; 14:1821-1841.
PMID: 33732000 PMC: 7956893. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S287354.
Denner D, Udan-Johns M, Nichols M World J Biol Chem. 2021; 12(1):1-14.
PMID: 33552397 PMC: 7818474. DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v12.i1.1.