» Articles » PMID: 12772987

Validation of Dynamic MLC-controller Log Files Using a Two-dimensional Diode Array

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2003 May 30
PMID 12772987
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivered with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) in the step-and-shoot mode uses multiple static MLC segments to achieve intensity modulation. For typical IMRT treatment plans, significant numbers of segments are delivered with monitor units (MUs) of much less than 10. Verification of the ability of the linear accelerator (linac) to deliver small MU segments accurately is an important step in the IMRT commissioning and quality assurance (QA) process. Recent studies have reported large discrepancies between the intended and delivered segment MUs. These discrepancies could potentially cause large errors in the delivered patient dose. We have undertaken a systematic study to evaluate the accuracy of the dynamic MLC log files, which are created automatically by our commercial MLC workstation after each delivery, in recording the fractional MU delivered in the step-and-shoot mode. Two linac models were evaluated with simple-geometry leaf sequences and delivered with different total MUs and different nominal dose rates. A commercial two-dimensional diode array was used for the measurement. Large discrepancies between the intended and delivered segment MUs were found. The discrepancies were larger for small MU segments at higher dose rate, with some small MU segments completely undelivered. The recorded fractional MUs in the log files were found to agree with what was delivered within the limits of our experimental uncertainty. Our results indicate that it is important to verify the delivery accuracy of small MU segments that could potentially occur in a patient treatment and that the log files are useful in checking the integrity of the linac delivery once validated. Thus validated log files can be used as a QA tool for general IMRT delivery and patient-specific plan verification.

Citing Articles

Comparison of MLC positioning deviations using log files and establishment of specific assessment parameters for different accelerators with IMRT and VMAT.

Lin X, Sun T, Liu X, Zhang G, Yin Y Radiat Oncol. 2022; 17(1):123.

PMID: 35842671 PMC: 9288677. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02097-0.


Insensitivity of machine log files to MLC leaf backlash and effect of MLC backlash on clinical dynamic MLC motion: An experimental investigation.

Barnes M, Pomare D, Doebrich M, Standen T, Wolf J, Greer P J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022; 23(9):e13660.

PMID: 35678793 PMC: 9512360. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13660.


Distributive quality assurance and delivery of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy treatments amongst beam matched linear accelerators: A feasibility study.

Rijken J, Schachenmayr H, Crowe S, Kairn T, Trapp J J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019; 20(4):99-105.

PMID: 30883010 PMC: 6448346. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12567.


Trajectory log file sensitivity: A critical analysis using DVH and EPID.

Woon W, Ravindran P, Ekayanake P, Vikraman S, Amirah S, Lim Y Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018; 23(5):346-359.

PMID: 30127675 PMC: 6097403. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.07.006.


Validation of Delivery Consistency for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy Plans.

Woon W, Ravindran P, Ekayanake P, Lim Y J Med Phys. 2018; 43(2):119-128.

PMID: 29962690 PMC: 6020617. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_109_17.