» Articles » PMID: 25867000

Towards Effective and Efficient Patient-specific Quality Assurance for Spot Scanning Proton Therapy

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Apr 14
PMID 25867000
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) program based on measurement alone can be very time consuming due to the highly modulated dose distributions of IMPT fields. Incorporating independent dose calculation and treatment log file analysis could reduce the time required for measurements. In this article, we summarize our effort to develop an efficient and effective PSQA program that consists of three components: measurements, independent dose calculation, and analysis of patient-specific treatment delivery log files. Measurements included two-dimensional (2D) measurements using an ionization chamber array detector for each field delivered at the planned gantry angles with the electronic medical record (EMR) system in the QA mode and the accelerator control system (ACS) in the treatment mode, and additional measurements at depths for each field with the ACS in physics mode and without the EMR system. Dose distributions for each field in a water phantom were calculated independently using a recently developed in-house pencil beam algorithm and compared with those obtained using the treatment planning system (TPS). The treatment log file for each field was analyzed in terms of deviations in delivered spot positions from their planned positions using various statistical methods. Using this improved PSQA program, we were able to verify the integrity of the data transfer from the TPS to the EMR to the ACS, the dose calculation of the TPS, and the treatment delivery, including the dose delivered and spot positions. On the basis of this experience, we estimate that the in-room measurement time required for each complex IMPT case (e.g., a patient receiving bilateral IMPT for head and neck cancer) is less than 1 h using the improved PSQA program. Our experience demonstrates that it is possible to develop an efficient and effective PSQA program for IMPT with the equipment and resources available in the clinic.

Citing Articles

Impact of Proton Irradiation Depending on Breast Cancer Subtype in Patient-Derived Cell Lines.

Musielak M, Graczyk K, Liszka M, Christou A, Rosochowicz M, Lach M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(19).

PMID: 39408826 PMC: 11477436. DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910494.


Patient-specific quality assurance of dynamically-collimated proton therapy treatment plans.

Bennett L, Hyer D, Vu J, Patwardhan K, Erhart K, Gutierrez A Med Phys. 2024; 51(9):5901-5910.

PMID: 38977285 PMC: 11781041. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17295.


Technical Note: Improving the workflow in a carbon ion therapy center with custom software for enhanced patient care.

Yaddanapudi S, Wakisaka Y, Furutani K, Yagi M, Shimizu S, Beltran C Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024; 30:100251.

PMID: 38707713 PMC: 11070275. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100251.


Development of a log file analysis tool for proton patient QA, system performance tracking, and delivered dose reconstruction.

Ates O, Pirlepesov F, Zhao L, Hua C, Merchant T J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023; 24(7):e13972.

PMID: 36951089 PMC: 10338751. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13972.


Adaptive proton therapy.

Paganetti H, Botas P, Sharp G, Winey B Phys Med Biol. 2021; 66(22).

PMID: 34710858 PMC: 8628198. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac344f.


References
1.
Zhang X, Liu W, Li Y, Li X, Quan M, Mohan R . Parameterization of multiple Bragg curves for scanning proton beams using simultaneous fitting of multiple curves. Phys Med Biol. 2011; 56(24):7725-35. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/24/003. View

2.
Zhao L, Newton J, Oldham M, Das I, Cheng C, Adamovics J . Feasibility of using PRESAGE® for relative 3D dosimetry of small proton fields. Phys Med Biol. 2012; 57(22):N431-43. PMC: 3844616. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/22/N431. View

3.
Dinesh Kumar M, Thirumavalavan N, Venugopal Krishna D, Babaiah M . QA of intensity-modulated beams using dynamic MLC log files. J Med Phys. 2011; 31(1):36-41. PMC: 3003892. DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.25668. View

4.
Gillin M, Sahoo N, Bues M, Ciangaru G, Sawakuchi G, Poenisch F . Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center, Houston. Med Phys. 2010; 37(1):154-63. PMC: 11078095. DOI: 10.1118/1.3259742. View

5.
Zhu X, Poenisch F, Li H, Zhang X, Sahoo N, Wu R . A single-field integrated boost treatment planning technique for spot scanning proton therapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014; 9:202. PMC: 4262206. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-202. View