» Articles » PMID: 12764406

Antihypertensive Efficacy and Safety of Olmesartan Medoxomil Compared with Amlodipine for Mild-to-moderate Hypertension

Overview
Journal J Hum Hypertens
Date 2003 May 24
PMID 12764406
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The antihypertensive efficacy of the angiotensin II receptor blocker olmesartan medoxomil has been shown to compare favourably with that of other antihypertensive agents. This randomized, double-blind study compared the antihypertensive efficacy of the starting dose of olmesartan medoxomil with that of the calcium channel blocker amlodipine besylate (amlodipine) in subjects with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Following a 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, 440 subjects aged >/=18 years were randomized to the starting dose of olmesartan medoxomil (20 mg/day), amlodipine (5 mg/day), or placebo for 8 weeks. Subjects were evaluated by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and by seated cuff blood pressure (BP) measurements at trough. The primary end point was the change from baseline in mean 24-h diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by ABPM at Week 8. Secondary end points included change from baseline in mean 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 8 weeks, change from baseline in mean seated trough cuff DBP and SBP measurements, and response and control rates for DBP <90 and <85 mmHg. Control rates for SBP <140 and <130 mmHg were also calculated. Olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine produced significantly greater reductions in ambulatory and seated DBP and SBP compared with placebo. Mean reductions in ambulatory and seated BP were similar between the two active agents; however, in the olmesartan medoxomil group, significantly more patients achieved the SBP goal of <130 mmHg and the DBP goal of <85 mmHg. Both drugs were well tolerated at the recommended starting dose. Although amlodipine was associated with a higher incidence of oedema, this did not reach statistical significance. Olmesartan medoxomil is an effective antihypertensive agent, with BP-lowering efficacy at the starting dose similar to that of amlodipine, and is associated with more patients achieving the rigorous BP goals of SBP <130 mmHg and DBP <85 mmHg.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of Olmesartan/Amlodipine Single-Pill Combination on 24-h Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Monitoring in Non-Responders to Valsartan or Candesartan Monotherapy.

Chung W, Ihm S, Choi Y, Youn H J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2024; 27(1):e14929.

PMID: 39504016 PMC: 11771777. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14929.


Efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for nocturnal blood pressure reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Liu J, Chen W, Shao S, Chen Y, Wang H, Xi Y Ann Med. 2024; 56(1):2362880.

PMID: 38830046 PMC: 11149579. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2362880.


Personalized Antihypertensive Treatment Optimization With Smartphone-Enabled Remote Precision Dosing of Amlodipine During the COVID-19 Pandemic (PERSONAL-CovidBP Trial).

Collier D, Taylor M, Godec T, Shiel J, James R, Chowdury Y J Am Heart Assoc. 2024; 13(4):e030749.

PMID: 38323513 PMC: 11010092. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030749.


Comparative peripheral edema for dihydropyridines calcium channel blockers treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Liang L, Kung J, Mitchelmore B, Cave A, Banh H J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2022; 24(5):536-554.

PMID: 35234349 PMC: 9106091. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14436.


Comparative effectiveness of an angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan medoxomil, in older hypertensive patients.

Redon J, Weber M, Reimitz P, Wang J J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018; 20(2):356-365.

PMID: 29462508 PMC: 8031060. DOI: 10.1111/jch.13183.