» Articles » PMID: 38830046

Efficacy of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for Nocturnal Blood Pressure Reduction: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Ann Med
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Jun 3
PMID 38830046
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) is correlated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and is an important predictor of cardiovascular death in hypertensive patients.

Objective: Nocturnal BP control is of great importance for cardiovascular risk reduction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for nocturnal BP reduction in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Methods: PICOS design structure was used to formulate the data extraction. All statistical calculations and analyses were performed with R.

Results: Seventy-seven studies with 13,314 participants were included. The overall analysis indicated that nocturnal BP drop varied considerably among different ARBs. Allisartan (13.04 [95% CI (-18.41, -7.68)] mmHg), olmesartan (11.67 [95% CI (-14.12, -9.21)] mmHg), telmisartan (11.11 [95% CI (-12.12, -10.11)] mmHg) were associated with greater reduction in nocturnal systolic BP. In the aspect of the nocturnal-diurnal BP drop ratio, only allisartan was greater than 1. While, the variation tendency of last 4-6 h ambulatory BP was basically consistent with nocturnal BP. Additionally, allisartan showed improvement effect in the proportion of patients with dipping BP pattern.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that for patients with mild to moderate hypertension, allisartan, olmesartan and telmisartan have more advantages in nocturnal BP reduction among the ARBs, while allisartan can reduce nighttime BP more than daytime BP and improve the dipping pattern.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Allisartan Isoproxil/Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension Uncontrolled by Amlodipine: A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Chi H, Zhang X, Ma S, Pan G, Lian X, Chen Y J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025; 27(1):e14955.

PMID: 39821945 PMC: 11771783. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14955.

References
1.
Turak O, Ozcan F, Tok D, Isleyen A, Sokmen E, Tasoglu I . Serum uric acid, inflammation, and nondipping circadian pattern in essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2013; 15(1):7-13. PMC: 8108262. DOI: 10.1111/jch.12026. View

2.
White W, Weber M, Davidai G, Neutel J, Bakris G, Giles T . Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the primary care setting: assessment of therapy on the circadian variation of blood pressure from the MICCAT-2 Trial. Blood Press Monit. 2005; 10(3):157-63. DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200506000-00008. View

3.
Neutel J, Kolloch R, Plouin P, Meinicke T, Schumacher H . Telmisartan vs losartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension--a randomised ABPM study. J Hum Hypertens. 2003; 17(8):569-75. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001592. View

4.
Madero M, Rodriguez Castellanos F, Jalal D, Villalobos-Martin M, Salazar J, Vazquez-Rangel A . A pilot study on the impact of a low fructose diet and allopurinol on clinic blood pressure among overweight and prehypertensive subjects: a randomized placebo controlled trial. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015; 9(11):837-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.07.008. View

5.
Chung O, Hinder M, Sharma A, Bonner G, Middeke M, Platon J . Comparison of the efficacy and safety of losartan (50-100 mg) with the T-type calcium channel blocker mibefradil (50-100 mg) in mild to moderate hypertension. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2000; 14(1):31-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2000.tb00391.x. View