» Articles » PMID: 19739281

Attitudes of Potential Providers Towards Preconceptional Cystic Fibrosis Carrier Screening

Overview
Journal J Genet Couns
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Genetics
Date 2009 Sep 10
PMID 19739281
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To determine the attitudes of potential providers (general practitioners and Community Health Service workers) towards preconceptional cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening and to determine which factors are associated with a positive attitude. A survey was conducted among 200 general practitioners (GPs) and 134 Community Health Service (CHS) workers. Fifty-two percent of the eligible GPs participated and 84% of the CHS workers. Fifty-five percent of the GPs and 73% of the CHS workers had a positive attitude towards routinely offering CF carrier screening, and more than 80% were in favor of informing the target population about the possibility of having a CF carrier test. A positive attitude was associated with (a) high perceived severity of CF (b) religion (nonreligious compared to Reformed), (c) low perceived barriers, and (d) high perceived test reliability. The care providers who are most likely to be involved in a preconceptional CF carrier screening program, i.e. GPs and CHS workers, generally have a positive attitude towards the implementation of such a program.

Citing Articles

Scaling-up and future sustainability of a national reproductive genetic carrier screening program.

Fehlberg Z, Best S, Long J, Theodorou T, Pope C, Hibbert P NPJ Genom Med. 2023; 8(1):18.

PMID: 37524740 PMC: 10390466. DOI: 10.1038/s41525-023-00357-w.


Preconception risk assessment for thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Tay-Sachs disease.

Hussein N, Henneman L, Kai J, Qureshi N Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 10:CD010849.

PMID: 34634131 PMC: 8504980. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010849.pub4.


Health practitioners' perceptions of the barriers and enablers to the implementation of reproductive genetic carrier screening: A systematic review.

Best S, Long J, Theodorou T, Hatem S, Lake R, Archibald A Prenat Diagn. 2021; 41(6):708-719.

PMID: 33533079 PMC: 8252081. DOI: 10.1002/pd.5914.


Preconception risk assessment for thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Tay-Sachs disease.

Hussein N, Weng S, Kai J, Kleijnen J, Qureshi N Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 3:CD010849.

PMID: 29537064 PMC: 6494256. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010849.pub3.


Preconception risk assessment for thalassaemia, sickle cell disease, cystic fibrosis and Tay-Sachs disease.

Hussein N, Weng S, Kai J, Kleijnen J, Qureshi N Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (8):CD010849.

PMID: 26264938 PMC: 6486309. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010849.pub2.


References
1.
Tambor E, Bernhardt B, Chase G, Faden R, Geller G, Hofman K . Offering cystic fibrosis carrier screening to an HMO population: factors associated with utilization. Am J Hum Genet. 1994; 55(4):626-37. PMC: 1918300. View

2.
Watson E, Williamson R, Chapple J . Attitudes to carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: a survey of health care professionals, relatives of sufferers and other members of the public. Br J Gen Pract. 1991; 41(347):237-40. PMC: 1371586. View

3.
Key C, Layton D, Shakir S . Results of a postal survey of the reasons for non-response by doctors in a Prescription Event Monitoring study of drug safety. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002; 11(2):143-8. DOI: 10.1002/pds.690. View

4.
Scheffer H, van den Ouweland A, Veeze H . [From gene to disease; from defective chloride ion transport to cystic fibrosis]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2001; 145(14):686-7. View

5.
Grol R . Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ. 1997; 315(7105):418-21. PMC: 2127297. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7105.418. View