» Articles » PMID: 12177221

Exposure of Adolescent Rats to Oral Methylphenidate: Preferential Effects on Extracellular Norepinephrine and Absence of Sensitization and Cross-sensitization to Methamphetamine

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2002 Aug 15
PMID 12177221
Citations 129
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methylphenidate (MP) (ritalin) is widely used in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, but little is known about therapeutic mechanisms or about possible consequences of long-term exposure. To more closely simulate the clinical use of the drug, we orally administered MP to adolescent rats during the dark-active phase of the circadian cycle at doses (0.75-3.0 mg/kg) below threshold for locomotor activation. We found that doses in this range increased extracellular norepinephrine in hippocampus without affecting dopamine in nucleus accumbens. These results suggest that norepinephrine systems may play an important role in the therapeutic action of this drug. To examine one potential consequence of long-term exposure to MP, i.e., the development of locomotor sensitization, an adaptational change that has been implicated in drug abuse liability, animals received three daily oral administrations of these doses of MP for up to 4 weeks through adolescence. The animals were then challenged with methamphetamine (0.5 mg/kg). We found that the behavioral response to MP did not change during the course of chronic treatment and that MP-pretreated animals did not exhibit a sensitized locomotor response to the methamphetamine challenge. We propose that, to the extent that this treatment protocol more closely reflects clinical exposure patterns, the relative insensitivity of accumbens dopamine to the acute administration of these MP doses, and the corresponding absence of evidence for the development of locomotor sensitization, supports one clinical view that there is little abuse liability associated with low dose, long-term MP treatment.

Citing Articles

Examining the Myth of Prescribed Stimulant Misuse among Individuals with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review.

Callovini T, Janiri D, Segatori D, Mastroeni G, Kotzalidis G, Di Nicola M Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024; 17(8).

PMID: 39204181 PMC: 11357389. DOI: 10.3390/ph17081076.


Methylphenidate Exposing During Neurodevelopment Alters Amino Acid Profile, Astrocyte Marker and Glutamatergic Excitotoxicity in the Rat Striatum.

Schmitz F, Duran-Carabali L, Rieder A, Silveira J, Ramires Junior O, Bobermin L Neurotox Res. 2024; 42(5):39.

PMID: 39190189 DOI: 10.1007/s12640-024-00718-y.


Dopamine, Norepinephrine and Serotonin Participate Differently in Methylphenidate Action in Concomitant Behavioral and Ventral Tegmental Area, Locus Coeruleus and Dorsal Raphe Neuronal Study in Young Rats.

Reyes-Vasquez C, Jones Z, Tang B, Dafny N Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(23).

PMID: 38068951 PMC: 10705956. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316628.


Effects of adolescent methylphenidate administration on methamphetamine conditioned place preference in an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Examination of potential sex differences.

Yates J, Broderick M, Berling K, Gieske M, Osborn E, Nelson M Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023; 252:110970.

PMID: 37748422 PMC: 10615784. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110970.


Cognition-enhancing and cognition-impairing doses of psychostimulants exert opposing actions on frontostriatal neural coding of delay in working memory.

Spencer R, Martin A, Devilbiss D, Berridge C Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023; 49(5):837-844.

PMID: 37741905 PMC: 10948860. DOI: 10.1038/s41386-023-01738-6.


References
1.
Taylor F, Russo J . Comparing guanfacine and dextroamphetamine for the treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001; 21(2):223-8. DOI: 10.1097/00004714-200104000-00015. View

2.
Biederman J, Wilens T, Mick E, Spencer T, Faraone S . Pharmacotherapy of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder reduces risk for substance use disorder. Pediatrics. 1999; 104(2):e20. DOI: 10.1542/peds.104.2.e20. View

3.
Scahill L, Chappell P, Kim Y, Schultz R, Katsovich L, Shepherd E . A placebo-controlled study of guanfacine in the treatment of children with tic disorders and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2001; 158(7):1067-74. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.7.1067. View

4.
McNamara C, Davidson E, Schenk S . A comparison of the motor-activating effects of acute and chronic exposure to amphetamine and methylphenidate. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1993; 45(3):729-32. DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(93)90532-x. View

5.
Segal D, Kuczenski R . Individual differences in responsiveness to single and repeated amphetamine administration: behavioral characteristics and neurochemical correlates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987; 242(3):917-26. View