» Articles » PMID: 35661631

A Dopamine D Agonist Versus Methylphenidate in Modulating Prefrontal Cortical Working Memory

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2022 Jun 6
PMID 35661631
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Methylphenidate is used widely to treat symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), but like other stimulants has significant side effects. This study used a rodent model (spontaneously hypertensive rat) of spatial working memory (sWM) to compare the effects of methylphenidate with the novel dopamine D-like receptor agonist 2-methyldihydrexidine. Acute oral administration of methylphenidate (1.5 mg/kg) caused sWM improvement in half of the tested rats, but impairment in the others. Both improvement or impairment were eliminated by administration of the D antagonist SCH39266 directly into the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Conversely, 2-methyldihydrexidine showed greater sWM improvement compared with methylphenidate without significant impairment in any subject. Its effects correlated negatively with vehicle-treated baseline performance (i.e., rats with lower baseline performance improved more than rats with higher baseline performance). These behavioral effects were associated with neural activities in the PFC. Single neuron firing rate was changed, leading to the alteration in neuronal preference to correct or error behavioral responses. Overall, 2-methyldihydrexidine was superior to methylphenidate in decreasing the neuronal preference, prospectively, in the animals whose behavior was improved. In contrast, methylphenidate, but not 2-methyldihydrexidine, significantly decreased neuronal preference, retrospectively, in those animals who had impaired performance. These results suggest that a D agonist may be more effective than methylphenidate in regulating sWM-related behavior through neural modulation of the PFC, and thus may be superior to methylphenidate or other stimulants as ADHD pharmacotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Methylphenidate is effective in ADHD by its indirect agonist stimulation of dopamine and/or adrenergic receptors, but the precise effects on specific targets are unclear. This study compared methylphenidate to a dopamine D receptor-selective agonist by investigating effects on working memory occurring via neural modulation in the prefrontal cortex. The data suggest that pharmacological treatment selectively targeting the dopamine D may offer a superior approach to ADHD pharmacotherapy.

Citing Articles

Dopamine D Receptor Agonists Rescue Age-related Decline in Temporal Order Memory.

Bransom L, Bassett A, Zhou M, Cimino J, Mailman R, Yang Y Neuroscience. 2024; 551:177-184.

PMID: 38823551 PMC: 11246218. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.05.033.


Dopamine in the prefrontal cortex plays multiple roles in the executive function of patients with Parkinson's disease.

Zhou Z, Yan Y, Gu H, Sun R, Liao Z, Xue K Neural Regen Res. 2023; 19(8):1759-1767.

PMID: 38103242 PMC: 10960281. DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.389631.


Characterization of behavioral changes in T-maze alternation from dopamine D agonists with different receptor coupling mechanisms.

Cimino J, Zhou M, Waxmonsky J, Mailman R, Yang Y Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2023; 240(10):2187-2199.

PMID: 37578525 PMC: 10693963. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-023-06440-5.

References
1.
Makris N, Biederman J, Valera E, Bush G, Kaiser J, Kennedy D . Cortical thinning of the attention and executive function networks in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Cereb Cortex. 2006; 17(6):1364-75. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl047. View

2.
Rosell D, Zaluda L, McClure M, Perez-Rodriguez M, Strike K, Barch D . Effects of the D1 dopamine receptor agonist dihydrexidine (DAR-0100A) on working memory in schizotypal personality disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014; 40(2):446-53. PMC: 4443959. DOI: 10.1038/npp.2014.192. View

3.
Doshi J, Hodgkins P, Kahle J, Sikirica V, Cangelosi M, Setyawan J . Economic impact of childhood and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the United States. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012; 51(10):990-1002.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.07.008. View

4.
Buschman T, Miller E . Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science. 2007; 315(5820):1860-2. DOI: 10.1126/science.1138071. View

5.
Yang Y, Mailman R . Strategic neuronal encoding in medial prefrontal cortex of spatial working memory in the T-maze. Behav Brain Res. 2018; 343:50-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.01.020. View